Corrugated Soundbite

The new gaff

2011-02-02T22:58:00.002Z

It's still a baby, but nonetheless, a little more open-minded than the old one. Although I dare say you'll notice a common theme or two developing...

Enjoy ;-)

That is all

2010-12-26T13:20:00.001Z

After much thought, I've decided to wrap up this blog.

I'll no doubt be returning to the blogosphere sometime in the New Year, but with a new identity and hopefully something a little more thoughtful and mature, containing much of what I've learned throughout my first spell in amongst you all.

This blog started out primarily as a platform to rant. But I've been through the anger stage now, or at least have it under control to a point where I'll only direct and unleash it at the right people.

In saying that though, I find it impossible to disagree with The Captain as to what the eventual solution will be.

Some say violence is the last resort of an immature mind. I say it boils down to who initiates it. There's nothing immature about standing up and defending yourself.

The state is good at initiating violence as the aggressor, is infinitely immature in its namecalling and ostracising of "heretics" and can violently kidnap you and lock you away based on what a couple of its apparatchiks in white coats merely say about you. It can steal from you, is happy to beat you to a pulp, enslaves your children and your childrens' children with debt, lies to you, and thinks it can dictate every last facet of your life even down to what you can and can't put into your own body. Which raises the question: who really owns you? And all this, without even mentioning the EU and two impossible-to-justify invasions of the Middle East.

The state and your monarch, in collusion with some of the biggest moneymen and powerbrokers in Britain, Europe and the world, started this rigged fight a long, long time ago. Any violence on our part now is merely defensive, and not a moment too soon, frankly. I've always been peaceable, but we will likely reach a time when being peaceable sees you either bludgeoned or imprisoned.

Until the big fight comes, I keep in my mind at all times that even sheep (and their closest relatives—Mr and Mrs Normal) stampede sometimes.

To finish off, many thanks to this blog's guest authors, and also to those who've taken the time to comment and read this stuff. It's been a pleasure having you all around.

Enjoy the rest of your Christmas. And a happy 2011 to you and yours. I'll probably see you round some time.

How to get rich and kill people

2010-12-20T20:25:00.001Z

I found the following video via Dick Puddlecote.

But it was interesting for me to not only see an eeeeevil sceptic highlighting the usual, laughable hypocrisy of the Believers and the profiteers, but also because he used their own, emotively driven style of argument against them.

And let's face it, that's what Fabians, Globalists and their owners have been doing for decades. Probably longer.

Not a bad effort, I thought:

It sits neatly with the hilarity of this article, sent in by a regular commenter (and I thank you).

Force can set you free

2010-12-18T21:10:00.002Z

Watch this. It looks tasty doesn't it? Almost delectable.

Look:

I dream it'll be us someday (and then some). And by "us", I mean those for a smaller government, not a bigger one. Not self-entitled Marxist, indoctrinating teachers or drunken Kappa-wearing "stoodents" and their equally Marxist, wheelchair-bound, swivel-eyed, spazzy brethren with "dodgy middle-stump" disease (see Jody McIntyre's alternative comedy act here).

On the one hand, I sympathise. They may be more akin to parasitic, blood-sucking leeches but they're still just about human. And let's not forget, they were made all kinds of promises, just the same as us. I'm not surprised they're getting shitty about them being broken.

But on the other hand, I struggle to sympathise with the sheer difference in attitude. They are demanding more, not less. They think it's their *right* to have the people like us fund their petty, Che Guevara t-shirt wearing, Starbucks-supping existences.

That's correct. Their *right* to override our *right* to keep the fruits of our own earnings. Their *right* to leach off it in order to indoctrinate our children and act as outreach workers for lazy Somali boat stealing wasters and Albanian pickpockets/gang rapists comes above all that (show me a lawfully self-sufficient Albanian and I'll show you my three foot cock and Dodge Viper SRT-10 breathing flames in mid-summer). Their *right* to help the lazy get lazier comes above all that.

Well, they wanted federalist government power. They can fucking reap it. Should've bought some chickens, candles, a pack of cards, and a shotgun.

It makes you think a lot about rights and mere privileges, doesn't it? I say, stamp on these bastards' fucking privileges whilst they persistently try to steal ours.

Our day will come. Not now, tomorrow, or next week. 2012 will be a big year. I have faith in it being a big year for us too.

Mel Gibson upsets Jews (again): Daily Wail all over it: shocker!

2010-12-16T21:38:00.001Z

Christianity? Fair game.

EDL (albeit Zionist)? Fair game.

Islam? Fair game.

Judaism? Oy vey!

Methinks the Daily Wail ought to do a little more research into the origins of the Cultural Marxism and usury it pretends to rail against on a daily basis.

Fucknuts.

Not dead...

2010-12-13T20:47:00.000Z

...just very busy.

Having said that though, it pleases me that in my absence, a regular troll of Old Holborn's has been keeping my presence very much alive. Thanks, mate!

With regards to this whole middle class sons-and-daughters-of-school-governors police brutality malarkey, I tend to find myself in agreement with Rab. The lefty students who support the idea of Labour's ratcheting up of the bully state for 13 years are now the ones publicly on the receiving end of it. And are sadly far too dim to realise that their ideology is the cause. This is what happens when you give certificates to spastics with side partings (perhaps now we can see why Labour were so keen).

Although in saying that, those now forming the Cleggeron Coagulation hardly conveyed the most vocal of opposition in past years, so let those fuckers take their share of the blame too. And the creepy hangers-on defending them.

But I digress. They may be indoctrinated, but seeing them getting a roughed up just doesn't affect me one iota, given what their more militant counterparts stand for.

If these are the brains of the future, then God help us. Not one voice opposed to high taxation, endless foreign aid, quangoes, bureaucracy, illegal wars, benefits 'n' housing for immigrants who've never worked here and don't even bother to learn the lingo, or our strictly democratic membership of the EU. All of which I dare say a significant amount of these stoodents would probably support, for no other reason than they've been told to support them.

Is this what we want? A generation of dipshits who do as they're told by suits? I thought they were rebels. Ha!

After apparently skipping all that, it's just gimme gimme gimme. Gimme the scraps thrown off the Big Table by the Elite, stolen from ordinary, tired, hardworking people (minimum wage earners too) at pain of violence and kidnap by the Almighty State they constantly demand "does something" to pay for degrees in flower arranging and golf club management. Well, now the Almighty State is doing something. It's YOUR turn now, crusties.

I fully expect to be hit with the argument that it'll be "my turn next". It will be anyway. It'll be everyone's turn at some point. It's what the students, the SWP and the trade unions wanted. But let us without big-governmental sin cast the first stone, eh?

Fuck 'em. Fuck 'em all. If a Marxist Utopian police state wasn't what a disproportionate amount of them wanted I might have some sympathy. But they do and I don't.

Sometimes, people just have to learn the hard way. Although I do admit, I have an interest in anyone holding their government to account (and sorely regret the crusties not doing serious damage to the Jug-Eared Prince and his Bit[ch]). I just wish it wasn't this lot doing it. It's entirely party political and principle can go and whistle, seemingly.

Just plain cynical

2010-11-29T21:10:00.001Z

There are many pieces that make up the puzzle of the mess we find ourselves in.

Everyone from the Rothschilds (the most inbred family in the world; by their own "rules") to GlaxoSmithKline Pharma to Arab and Russian oil tycoons to other assorted wealthy corporatists.

But this Wikileaks thing just has something "mainstream" about it. Insofar as the mainstream are talking about it. Endlessly.

We know what authoritarian governments do when they REALLY don't like something. They go hell for leather to eliminate it. And they usually succeed (barring a violent revolution—which they avoid by hypnotism via Strictly Cum X-Factor).

However, my own cynicism is not a good enough reason not to read this. It's comprehensive and an excellent read.

What do you think of it all?

How very strange!

2010-11-23T01:37:00.001Z

Not sure if it's some sort of a spoof (I initially doubt it), but I found something very interesting via a comment by Katabasis over at Gotty's place.

EDL LGBT division.

Seems "minority rule" is slowly beginning to eat itself. Or rather, they've noticed an unpleasant smell creeping into the peace n love lounge from the cool culti kitchen. Who'da thunk a bunch of football firms would be more accommodating to bum bangers and gash guzzlers than the Bow Street Massive?

But I think I'll wait and see. I trust nothing until I see it happening. And I'm sober. And I get it on film. And watch it a few times. With witnesses.

But this is one squabble I'd get popcorn for (question: can handbags issue Fatwas?).

Just HOW FAR would these people go?

2010-11-21T23:53:00.001Z

I found the following article via AngryTeen.

The naked truth: The TSA can touch my junk anytime.

Seeing as the Grauniad are—for some strange reason—a bit prissy about anyone nicking any of their content, I'm not going to bother. I do have an intellectual advantage over them insofar as I do actually think, as opposed to merely doing and thinking whatever I'm told to by corrupt government/mega corp alliances.

It seems that the emotive-persuasive angle of the article goes along the lines of "Well, TSA screener workers don't like it either, so that makes it OK".

Luckily, AngryTeen has done a lot of the research so we don't have to, which includes tracking down the below video. And if emotive-persuasive reasoning is what the Grauniad and its bosses want, that's how we'll play it here too.

Have a butchers. But don't watch it too many times or else the author of the CiF piece (a Richard Adams) will probably call for you to be arrested and killed Halal-style on the off-chance you might be a paedophile:

The CiF piece is an incredible obfuscation which takes us through the age-old political tribalism, namecalling, "nothing to hide, nothing to fear", the inevitable cry of "racist!" at those who either detract or, more importantly, compliantly follow along with the entirely MSM-driven "it were them Muzzies what dunnit" narrative. He appears to be confusing himself more so than us.

Read the piece. It's incredible, and is a masterclass in left-liberal doublethink. Simply put, Richard Adams appears to be going for a job in government. Or at least a free lunch or two.

May the chef spit and spunk in it.

British students "xenophobic"

2010-11-21T21:53:00.001Z

I thought they'd just about beaten all semblance of life out of this one. But it seems not.

The article strongly alludes to the fact that British students don't want to study abroad because they hate, well, all of abroad. And this is because of colonial mastery, apparently.

A "colonial mastery", which as we know from the constant guilt trips, didn't involve going abroad at all. It was all done from the comfort of the classic leather sofa neatly juxtaposed to a 50-inch widescreen telly spewing out propaganda like this. In Dagenham.

Therefore, if you don't want to travel the globe or leave your family behind, spending—and more importantly, borrowing—lots of money to do so, I'm afraid you're a racist.

Leon Trotsky lies laughing in his grave. If it wasn't overseas and I wasn't such a xenophobe, I'd gob on it.

One World

2010-11-20T19:15:00.003Z

As noted by Trooper Thompson, and with key quotes transcribed by Goodnight Vienna, this NWO tool never misses an opportunity to cite "global governance".

It's a short clip but in assessing the key words and the frequency of their mentions, it's hard not to ignore the topic.

Make of it what you will!

Being a minority in your own country: does it matter?

2010-11-19T18:22:00.002Z

Via Norton Folgate, I learn that Mrs Dale was asking something similar to the following on his radio show yesterday. If you heard it and got a different impression, feel free to correct me in the comments.

This seemed to be the gist:

Does it matter if you are a minority in your own country, if you do see it as a problem, what does that say about you?

Well, yes it does matter, Iain. It matters greatly. Not least for someone of your persuasion, seeing as you'd be burned alive, have brick walls pushed on top of you, and be cursed to eternal damnation and a lifetime of pain by the cultures you seem to think aren't causing much of a problem growing here.

You're not likely to get beaten to death and set alight for thrusting your manky maggot up some chump's trapdoor in your own home within Britain's hideously white communities. And you know this Iain, because that's where you choose to live and live well. Try throwing one of your paddies in the backstreets of Harlesden or Upton Park.

It does matter. Even more so to Iain and his minority than it does to me. That is, if it's a matter of survival and escaping persecution, which from his constant hissies we assume he's trying to do (and then some!) in a not-so-macho sort of a manner.

Growing Third World cultures gets you the Third World. That's why the Third World is as it is (because it's full of Third Worlders who do what they do regardless of aid or "benefits"). And of course, that's saying nothing of what he appears to be actually asking, which some may interpret as being more along the lines of:

Is it OK to slowly wipe out the English, the Scots, the Welsh and the Northern Irish? And if not, what does that say about you, you bigot!

To which I retort with:

Is it OK to wipe out the Bangladeshis or the Nigerians by making them minorities in their own countries via mass, engineered immigration of white Europeans into those nations?

And you say:

Of course it's not! You racist!

And I agree.

I'm not sure if he was playing devil's advocate here, and it's perfectly possible he was merely provoking discussion. He's an attention seeker if nothing else and it really wouldn't surprise me.

But if not, for anything like a libertarian philosophy to prevail, you need a population that is largely geared to policing themselves as individuals and behaving in a civilised, motivated, non-violent, non-persecuting manner.

And that's the West, I'm afraid. The West that wasn't built up by Bangladeshis, Ghanaians, Somalians or Nigerians, no matter what the BBC says. And to emphasise some irony for Iain, the West that affords him the privilege of publicly parading his homosexuality without being murdered wasn't built up by witch doctors, warlords, pirates, Moldovan people traffickers or Imams.

I'm very aware that this doesn't apply to all incomers or their offspring. And to those who do wish to embrace our culture, I say "great". They'll never be British just as I'll never be Persian or Slavic, but fair play and I'm more than welcoming (although I'm equally aware that there are simply too many people here. Way too many...)

However, for that to happen, there does need to be a distinct and dominant culture prevailing. And the closest thing to that is the culture that built this place. The determination and self reliance that did so. Not a squawking bunch of divided minorities (of which Dale is one) who unite when it suits them to demand the government offer them protection at great cost to everyone else's wallet and liberty. That's the antithesis of libertarianism.

The road to libertarianism starts by facing cold hard truths, and not sugar coated lies. It means escaping Goebbels' lie theory that sums up today's media to the disrespect of those who died with half a dozen boiling hot bullets in them thinking they were defeating it. It means simply using your own eyes and ears.

The question remains however, how many people are prepared to do that? My guess is plenty. But only when the power cuts and food shortages come.

A pity.

UPDATE: ArtCo has identified a different angle to Iain Dale's question.

No guns needed

2010-11-17T20:35:00.001Z

Someone drop (an ideally counterfeit) fiver just outside the gate instead.

Then the rush will come. Then we'll be waiting with piano wire.

Better get those bunkers tidied up, dear parliamentarians. I'm sure there'd be nothing in the water for you once you got yourselves comfy down there.

Oh, and it's not just me who's losing sleep. Other anxious citizens are stressing their worst fears.

As far as distractions go, the useful (useless) idiots in Westminster are falling into a pretty dismal second place behind the true Mummies and Daddies of greed and self interest—The Royals.

My rage has gone

2010-11-16T21:20:00.002Z

(Post title lifted from fraser).

My rage hasn't gone for the reasons that you may think it has. One or two bloggers have quit for the simple reason that their man got in. Of course, it doesn't matter to them what their man does. Just that it's their man doing it (with a rusty cheesegrater). To those people, I say enjoy the hell you're helping to create for yourselves and the rest of us. You won't be supping home brew in my mud hut when the shit really does hit the fan.

Others have quit simply because they're tired of repeating the same old arguments. Entirely understandable. When you've been clearly stating the merits of your viewpoints for three years, nothing changes and your readership stays more or less the same, I imagine it must get tiresome.

I got sick of being just angry all the time. Red is a potent colour and it clouds my vision.

When I analysed what it was I was actually angry with, I realised it was the wrong thing. Luckily for the Labour wing of the Marxist Party, their sheer physical hideousness hid the hideousness of their endless liberty destroying laws, illegal wars, kissing Rothschild arse constantly, their doublethink, their rising taxation and their theft.

To put it simply, Labour (narrowly) losing the election looked like a dog's dinner at a eugenics factory. But for the sake of punishment, I did quite enjoy it.

I just can't get angry about stuff like this anymore:

A Labour frontbencher has launched an astonishing attack on middle-class voters, branding them liars, racists, drunkards and even paedophiles.

I don't really see how this is news. As I've noted above, he comes from the militant wing of the Marxist Party, so hating—and ultimately destroying—the middle classes (of which he is one) and calling dissenters slur words for rejecting his brand of socialism is to be expected.

Of course, what this does do is to throw attention back onto the age old, long since pointless tribalism between Red Labour and the Nearly-as-Red Tories and keep attention away from policy and what matters to us minions in our everyday lives. We either get a Socialist-Corporatist government, or a Corporatist-Socialist government.

We get the EU. We pay for bailouts. We get more orchestrated mass immigration despite high unemployment and we get a continuation of illegal wars in non-hostile lands, which will continue to cause untold death and suffering to those immediately involved on both sides, and will continue to help bankrupt us.

These are the big issues of our time. Frankly, I can't be bothered with ANY of this party political guff. It's always been us versus them and this has always been a distraction.

This blog may be taking a distinct change in direction over the coming months. Not left, not right. Just a search for truth and integrity. In short, all those things that are a lot easier to find when you clear your head of meaningless tribal rage, start reading, and start focusing.

I'm sick of seeing the public's anger and its direction constantly micromanaged by the Establishment. I'm sick of the "change", which is simply Orwellian speak for keeping things exactly the same as they were before. I'm sick of the control and I'm sick of the lies.

If there's one good thing the election has done, it's to shake the closet statists out of the tree. Those who merely want to sit back and let their man force statism upon us in much the same manner as the last freak show did.

I say "good riddance".

Good reads...

2010-11-15T20:02:00.003Z

I thought I might make this a bit of a weekly feature (until I forget, that is). Here's some of what I've found interesting over the last week for various reasons. Please enjoy.

Now the State wants to touch your sexual organs at airports (Solution: Boycott the airlines) (The Talking Clock)

Sitting in the ruins (Nominedeus)

The greatest lie ever told (Captain Ranty. The comments section also makes for excellent reading)

Stay healthy for the scrapyard (Underdogs Bite Upwards)

Albert Pike and the three World Wars (threeworldwars.com)

My rage has gone... (An Individual Voice)

Bakri arrested in Lebanon (Barking Spider)

Silent cattle calling (Calling England)

Priorities (The Boiling Frog)

Vince Cable dictates leader of LPUK (GOT)

A wee post about them Scots

2010-11-13T18:57:00.002Z

I—like many English people—had been trained to laugh at Scots. Been trained to laugh at their quaint expressions of identity. And the even more quaint ways in which they hang on to it. Basically, trained via education and the media, to think that Scottish people were very vocal but very insignificant.

It's only now, when I realise just how battered and assaulted the English identity is, that I've learned to carry a fair amount of respect for the way a lot of "stereotypical" Scots do what they do; wear kilts, eat Haggis, drink until they're beyond merry and simply do what Scottish people know best. And to not feel ashamed of any of it. Anyone would think they were living in Scotland the way they carry on!

In blog land, I look to the Scots bloggers a lot. Particularly the few Scottish libertarian bloggers (the socialist bloggers who represent a fair chunk of the Scottish votership just haven't seen what their principles do to a nation. Yet). These libertarian bloggers don't worry themselves about being libertarian in the rehearsed, Nu Populist, approved sense. They just come straight out and say it. Don't like it? Don't read it. Simple as that.

There are, however, a band of Scottish faux-nationalists, who—whilst in part attempting to appeal to a libertarianish audience—seem to think allowing and encouraging every other nationality to grow within is somehow nationalist. I do hope this ridiculous lot don't grow legs. Although sadly, I suspect their version of Scottish nationalism will be the accepted version. For no other reasons than because it was beaten into them from childhood upwards by an establishment who have a certain fruition in mind.

I'd like to think that by the time I die, there will be at least a small area of Britain that harbours the values that made these islands the civilisation they are.

We (Brits in general) are a slightly insular people (although welcoming to friendly guests); slightly arrogant at times, very humourous, and given half a chance, very resourceful too.

You can see why the Powers that Be want to destroy it all now...

Doing to the "do-ers" what they do to us

2010-11-13T14:54:00.000Z

I've been reading and watching a lot about Marxism and Critical Theory. The theory being exactly that—to criticise. No more, no less, and only authoritarian/totalitarian "solutions" available.

Just criticism and antagonism, as long as it's beneficial to those in authority and conducive to restrictions of basic freedoms and to trashing common values within a nation state. Nation states which, as we know, that weasel-faced suited subordinate from the "nation" of paedophiles and half-decent chocolate thinks are bad, bad things.

So I'm gathering a list of unanswered questions, in the hopes that maybe one or two of you might like to add to them in the comments section?

Why—if nicotine is so bad—are there adverts for patches and gum full of the stuff on the telly?

Why—if we're supposedly (and no, I don't believe it) fighting expensive wars in the Middle East/Western Asia to spread "Western style democracy", are our overlords doing piss all, and even encouraging by their lack of speaking out, the growth of Sharia Law in Britain?

Why—if our overlords are so keen to get the British unemployed back into work, do our mongs and faux EU-sceptics insist we're better off within the EU when the EU goes about making deals like this? And why do their useful idiots stay so quiet about it? Brainwashing and tribalism, anyone?

Why does nobody criticise Kosher ritual sacrifice of livestock (I think I can guess this one)? It's exactly the same as Halal ritual sacrifice. The beard and soppy pyjamas (or lack thereof) of the backyard assassin means very little when having a blunt blade ripped through your throatal tissue.

Why do the Green Communists never question the obvious inconsistencies of wind power, when the tide never, ever stops moving, thus making wave/tidal power a more viable option than wind?

Why have the Tory bloggers been so quiet about this? There's more to principle than a rosette. Apart from purposes of identification, it doesn’t really matter if your mugger is sporting a similar shade of stonewash Wranglers to you or not when the mugging takes place. Does it?

Why does nobody realise the obvious similarities between governments and protection rackets? Both will use violence against you if you don't pay, and both offer to "protect" you when you do (the police, the NHS, street football coordinators, lesbian outreach workers, etc. All just as useless as the "protection" offered by rackets).

Why—if British culture is so repugnant and something we need to feel so guilty about all the bloody time, do people from all over the Second and Third Worlds flock here to enjoy at least some of its benefits? And why, when our Establishment constantly tell us these people are here to avoid persecution back home in their own cultures, do they constantly decry anyone who shows concern about the growth of those same violent, witch doctor-driven cultures in parts of Britain?

And why—if all these expensive gadgets and embellishments really did "save time for busy professionals" as marketed, do so few people question why they're still so busy these days (and thousands of pounds later)?

That's just a very, very few. Fancy adding some more?

UPDATE: Harbinger has added some further thinkies into the mix via the comments:

Why when we have 3million unemployed do they continue to import more immigrants, unskilled at that from polar opposite cultures?

Another point:

Why are we continually attacked in society for prejudice and racism were Harriet Harman's positive discrimination laws created?

Another point:

Why are the government complaining of the workshy and hoping to bring in Slave Labour community service for the unemployed, when they already have signed a JSA agreement that allows the government to dock their benefit if they don't adhere to their contract?

Another point:

Why are so many victims of anti white crime, washed under the carpet yet victims of white crime published in every paper up and down the land?

Another point:

Why can criminals take the government to court for losing their right to vote when as everyone should know they lose (or should lose) all civil rights when they commit a crime?

I quite agree...

2010-11-13T08:45:00.001Z

...with Gotty, when he rhetorically asks exactly what IDS is planning to do about feckless, feral, scrounging scum like this who think the hardworking British taxpayer owes them a living.

In true feral chav style, Gordon has been involved in terrorising residents on other estates and bragging about it, stealing from the elderly, sponging, and STILL refuses to work for his staggering £65,000+ state benefits package, plus extras.

Put him and his "crew" (i.e the entire ~~workshy feral gang, named Westminster Bluds~~ political class) to work for £2.16 an hour. Preferably picking up litter in Tower Hamlets. At night.

The emperor's used clothes

2010-11-11T20:14:00.000Z

I don’t normally bother much with the party political blogs (with the exceptions of some UKIP and LPUK ones) instead favouring the unaligned blogs written by individuals with their own sets of concerns.

Recently I’ve been looking around the Tory blogs and I’m mildly stunned (dunno why though) at the MSM-style dodging of the issues that they seemed to collectively lambaste when the One-Eyed Calamitous Car Crash and Comrades were at the helm.

I’ve compiled a little list of issues and problems the Tory Claque (as dubbed by Richard of EU Referendum) have seemingly consciously or silently agreed not to mention very often:

The EU

The continuation of engineered mass immigration into an already overcrowded UK

The many flaws in IDS’ proposed schemes for the unemployed because of negligence of the above points. How do you fit five million+ into half a million jobs? Many of which are temporary

The Afghan war

The bansturbation

The lack of, well—anything whatsoever to restore civil liberties

Enforced globalisation

More climate change fraud

More taxes (“fat tax” rearing its ugly head again).

The debt (never mind the deficit—that’s easily fixed with a few tweaks. Just don’t mention the debt! Stand back, say nothing and watch it grow. Our children's' future servitude depends on it. So does ours).

So in effect, with so many current partisan Tory bloggers (obviously I exclude those who’ve seen right through “Cam" and The Boy and become unaligned right wingers) are telling us is that all the above is now OK because it’s their man organising it. Or rather, he's ignoring it, enjoying the excuse of the Limp Dems' presence and maintaining the status quo with spin and divide and conquer exercises.

Some of them work for the party in some capacity or other, so obviously it’s in their best interests to keep quiet and pump out whatever distraction Cameron and his cronies want them to. Reminds me of essay copying at school, where we’d all copy from the clever kid (he could be bribed without coercion) and then use a thesaurus to alter a few words in the naive hopes that Mr Fatty Brown Trousers wouldn't notice. Same hypothesis and conclusion, of course. Some conclusions were just a little bit more Shakespearian than others.

But then there are others who are simply members. They actually part with membership fees to be a tiny cog in a segment of the British arm of an international machine that stamps in all our faces in the exact same manner as Labour did. And for that, just as I do with the Labour and Lib Dem lot, I thank them most sincerely. They don’t (usually) even have the excuse of the chronic levels of retardation and brain flatulence that reside within the Labour grassroots, and it's too cold for sandals thanks to global climate disruption (climate delayed by fifteen minutes due to a salvo of spunk ejaculated from an 8th floor penthouse onto a pantograph). So it must just be denial. Or worse.

No really. If there's a difference between iDave, The Boy and the grandees, and those who came before them, I'd love you to point it out (apart from lookswise. Nobody can be as physically vomit-inducing as Labour). Truth is, on the big issues, there is none. Hence so many Tory bloggers resort to waffling on about trivialities because some left wing wanker said something "unnice" about Nadine Dorries—a woman who has employed family members on good salaries paid for by us and troughed relentlessly just like a left wing wanker. Not to mention, she's democratic enough to switch off commenting on her blog, for which we pay the hosting fees.

I didn't like Punch and Judy when I was a child and I like it even less now. Less than boiled cabbage and Somalians.

Please just see that the new boss is exactly the same as the old boss in its desire to be the boss at the behest of the real bosses. Political tribalism in this climate is utterly pointless.

Oh, and The Boy has been to Bilderberg a few times.

My solution to the unemployment problem

2010-11-10T22:57:00.001Z

It's plain common sense. Granted, all the points mentioned below might not sound overly "libertarian", but it seems we're reaching (if we've not already reached) total crisis point. And being in fashion hasn't got anything done.

Here's what I think would go some considerable way to fixing unemployment:

Get out of the EU. If they fight us, shoot their planes out of the air and sink their ships. They won't trade with us anyway (for now, at least. Until someone fancies access to our market) so any embargoes won't mean much for long.

Stop all immigration now. Find all those "students", illegals, and those on expired visas living here illegally and get rid.

Get shot of the tide of bureaucracy and gross taxation and heavy rates that are hammering SMEs to the benefit of mega corporations who can then operate on skeleton staff once there's no alternative, thus causing unemployment, both by those who lose their jobs in the lost SMEs, and those considered "surplus" in the mega corps once they've got a big monopoly.

Get shot of those who preside over it and legislate for it.

Get rid of all quangoes and reduce the remit of councils to collecting rubbish and providing a few houses (only for those who've paid into the system for at least 10 years, as with what I'd suggest for benefits). Plus the council pension schemes. Council workers—pay into your own, like proper people have to.

Stop wasting money on crap like policing drugs, smoking, alcohol and "incitement of hatred". If someone assaults, steals, or damages the property of another, by all means, it's the police's business. Not otherwise.

EDIT: And not forgetting, an end to these pointless, illegal wars in foreign, non-hostile lands (missing that one out would put me at risk of sounding somewhat neo-con). End them today.

Bingo - instant lower taxation (and if not—why not) for both individuals and businesses. Inspiration to work, inspiration to start local businesses employing local people. A meritocracy where the most talented and hardest working flourish without hindrence. And those who just want to do enough to get by and get the rent paid can also manage.

Simple? Yes.

Tried and tested? Yes.

Popular with the Establishment and MSM? Nope.

Can't be much wrong with it then.

Good reads...

2010-11-08T22:00:00.001Z

OK. I admit it. I'm a lazy bastard. Fortunately, others aren't.

Here's just some of what I've found interesting in the last few days. Please enjoy:

An art lesson for Europe (by ArtCo).

The hierarchy (by the inimitable Cap'n)

Royal Navy website hacked—MoD officially about as useful as a pair of sunglasses on a bloke with one ear (by the All Seeing Eye)

An alternative view to the mainstream on fixing unemployment (by Harbinger)

Nonsense on stilts (by the Boiling Frog)

MSM caught napping again (by G.O.T)

How to deal with TV licensing (by Beware of Geeks)

Fields filled with expensive solar panels can't actually grow food (by Dark Lochnagar)

Treason and John Hurst's stand (by Indy)

Alistair Campbell and the shame of Sheffield (by Katabasis)

Shocking!

2010-11-06T22:22:00.001Z

Allow me to paint a little scenario.

You are an MP, (allegedly) serving a working class area of East London. You stand by a system that encourages and embraces mass immigration from Islamic lands with the help of a massive welfare state and the promise of streets paved with gold (this isn't something you pay for of course. You just take, from those who pay for it at pain of violence and imprisonment inflicted by your system if they don't cough up).

You don't ask any of those who fund your lavish lifestyle what they think of that of course. Because that would be racist (by the standards of officialdom, not your constituents) and you've got to keep that stolen salary coming in, or else it's vin ordinaire for you! You just go ahead and stand by that system, encourage it, speak up for it, and profit from it regardless. You can buy houses because of it and all your thinking has been done for you. Nice, eh?

Your loyalty is to your bank balance and to The Party; who could deselect you easily if you refuse to toe their line. So could the people but you can just lie to them and have them arrested or smeared and ostracised for disagreeing with your regurgitations. Your loyalty is not to those whose labours you "earn" a living from whilst sat on your sanctimonious arse. It's to those who make it all possible for you.

You don't read history, because what happened elsewhere can't happen here because we're British and we're above all that. Because you say so. And because the British can be policed out of all that nasty discussion, protest and concern with batons. You stand by that too.

You don't read about religion. Or psychology. Or tribalism. Or any of those tricky subjects that are basic facets of humanity, and for which someone whose job it is to service the societal concerns of human beings ought to be very, very interested in. We all feel these feelings and we've all been victims of these feelings. Every last one of us! Better ignore them, then. You don't want humans. You want automatons.

When the system you stand by, profit from and staunchly pretend to agree with has created the New People by way of growing a significant Islamic population in the area of the country you "serve", you then vote very strongly for a war on an Islamic land. Based on no real evidence of hostility towards Britain from that land whatsoever. You then vote very strongly against an investigation into the build-up and reasoning leading up to that war. Against an Islamic land. You're shitting in the faces of your New People.

You then get stabbed by an Islamic woman when you deign to turn up at a surgery meeting for your mere sixty-odd thousand a year plus many more thousands in expenses.

You then—somehow—get the sympathy vote (and embrace it) because you're a white, wholesome chappy. Isn't that racist? It is by your standards, Mr Timms. You arsewipe.

People may think I don't care much for the "suffering" of the Right Honourable Stephen Timms. And that's because I don't. He's a doublethinker; stupid, corrupt, thick, greedy, a thief, doing the bidding of cultural Marxists who want an infighting, fractured society, and globalists who want a bloated pool of "potential labour" as a means to drive down salaries and increase profits (by means of private lobbying and intervention, of course. Not the vote).

The Daily Mail readership are doing exactly as they're intended to do. They are looking at the symptoms and not the cause. Some of them even sympathise with the cause. And it's then, when they start to become the cause.

Councillors find the scenario I've painted "shocking".

Do you?

Erm, sorry...

2010-11-06T02:03:00.001Z

But this terrierist business isn't even original...

Haven't we heard this before, but from a British perspective?

2010-11-02T22:00:00.003Z

The faces may differ, but the poisonous message of Socialism remains ever constant.

What fun

2010-10-30T05:48:00.002+01:00

Ink cartridge-based explosives experts. Yesterday.

I'm getting sick of this.

Just days until Bollock Maobama takes an inevitable hiding in the mid-terms, and "terror" is the order of the day.

But more interestingly, this time it was the Jews (ever the victim) who were the targets. Yes Citizens, the Islamic World is so pissed off with the West that they loaded some test packages—as well as one or two live jobbies—onto cargo planes having addressed them to synagogues.

Never mind targetting government buildings, military bases or anywhere officially connected with the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. No, they decided to target a minority that makes up considerably less than 5% of the American population from thousands of miles away, despite there being plenty of Muslims in America who (one would have thought) any self-respecting terror group might look to utilise.

I haven't bought any of this for a long time. But now it's just getting silly.

Blogger set to release novel. Andrew Marr found wanting.

2010-10-21T22:57:00.002+01:00

Well, he may be getting pissed as I write this (not as pissed as I'd get, I'll bet), but Leggy has bagged himself a deal. It's now official. About fucking time he put something into print, if you ask me ;-)

What else is there to say, other than "well done". Although he is an actual writer (and a scientist, in his spare time), unlike what I stumble across daily in the MSM. Leg Iron's success surprises me less than theirs. Although, in my humble view, it's far better deserved.

When Marr brings out his novel, I'll let you know.

The Trotsky UAF believe in God now?

2010-10-19T13:21:00.003+01:00

Although somebody elses of course.

That goes without saying......

What I've always said about Somalia is true

2010-10-18T00:45:00.001+01:00

It's a shithole. And it's a shithole by my standards because it's full of Somalians with Somalian beliefs and values. No other reason. Or is there? You tell me.

Why do well-to-do people keep going there to get kidnapped by a conglomerate of 13th century goat herders and teeth sucking, AK-47-wielding, boat-stealing, sister-shagging gangstas? WHO GIVES A SHIT what goes on in Bristol East? I don't. I don't live there and it doesn't affect my daily life.

It's simply a symbol of righteousness, isn't it? "Hey, I've been to Somalia and helped a bunch of people I think are too stupid to help themselves. I mean they're nice blokes but they can't stop shooting each other for no good reason. Not even Allah has a reason. But they still do it".

So, Righteous, why do you think Somalia is a dump? Is it because it's full of Danes, Spaniards and Englishmen? Or...?

Bear this in mind if you live in Southend.

Every cloud...

2010-10-16T20:00:00.001+01:00

Whilst I never bought into this business of "cuts" (to increasing expenditure) as being anything other than an exercise to free up more money we don't have in order to cater for the loss of our rebate from the EU (which we're better off in. Dontcha know?), you've got to admit it's at least a little bit amusing to see and read this.

Of course, had Teachers TV been around when Bob was at skool, his teachers would've had an invaluable resource in enabling them to better teach Bob to read (contract clauses).

Go on Bob! Give the EU and their bankster friends their * fockin' money!

* Ours. Obviously.

Another day in the life of a Wail reader...

2010-10-16T15:35:00.002+01:00

UPDATE: Beware of Geeks has posted in detail on the TV Licence.

Leaving aside the fact that the Daily Wail is a great tool for authoritarians and profiteers alike (constantly screeching about "Binge Britain" and the need to increase duty, etc), the mindset of the readership is kept in a time decades ago by this very same newspaper. Have a look at this comment (from here):

Instead of sacking BBC idiots they give them multi million pound severance packages.
This has to stop.
I wish I was allowed to sort them out.
They are not going to stop the gravy train.
They will just take a different route.
- Kaz Hodgson, Pompey, 16/10/2010 12:58
Click to rate Rating +10

Hmmm. I'm intrigued. How is it going to be stopped? By "Kaz" repeatedly stating that this has to stop and then handing the money over anyway? Why can't she do her bit to "sort 'em ahhhhtttt" by simply withholding her licence fee or ditching the telly altogether? I've never been more informed since I got shot of the TV, and if I do fancy a bit of visual entertainment, my computer plays DVDs (not that sort of DVD. Much). Which I get to choose as single entities.

You'd have thought this crowd might have learned something from the fuss they kicked up over the "Sachs-gate" and executive pay furores over the last year or so. But what incentive does the BBC have to learn anything whatsoever when mongs keep paying. And, worse still, they keep watching. Yep, this same crowd, who—like me—very much believe the media is dumbed down, not only keep paying for it, but keep subjecting themselves to it.

But why?

I'll hazard a guess as to the fact there's a deeper problem. The reason so many "hardworking Middle Englanders" (i.e. Excel jockeys) sit in front of the telly all evening is because they're knackered. And they're knackered because they either work too hard or have all their energy sapped by boring work for 12 hours a day. And they work too hard because, in many cases, they've lived to excess and it all now needs paying for. A good percentage of them will be repossessed at the end of it all. So in effect, it's fucking pointless.

They're exactly where the government wants them and it's entirely their own fault.

The thoughts of the Daily Wail crowd are largely synonymous with the thoughts of most adults down here in my part of the country. Equally, their cries of "Something must be done!" are about as paying heed to as the government's typical "Questions will be asked!" rebuttals when a toddler is tortured to death over a period of 18 months under the lazy eye of the ponzi scam that is local government.

The reason why I've picked on this comment is because for me, it's just so totally the opposite of what actual small-government advocates would say or do. "Kaz", and millions of others, won't even give up something they plainly don't enjoy. They'd rather pay. It's what I've heard hundreds of times in pubs. Not even something as insignificant (and beneficial) as either ditching the telly altogether or simply just reading up on the scam of TV licensing itself is worth doing, apparently.

And all this because they're knackered because they're trapped because they didn't check the bait for a barbed hook. And because they're knackered, they believe the Good Things they see on the telly about politicians "listening" and "caring" which, ironically, they know is tripe because they're still saying it after 20 years (and getting nowhere), and they know the media is dumbed down anyway. This is beyond parody! It's somewhere close to Triplethink.

I'm reaching a pitch now where I see this lot—the average men and women on the street—as an enemy. Seems wrong, in a way, doesn't it? After all, they'll more likely end up in a worse position than I ever will because I've always been happy with less and lived within my means. But shat on, they will be, and have been.

But my freedoms and the country I grew up in being torn apart by the negligence, laziness and the desperation to be "lead" exhibited by people like this in the faces of those who seek to reduce us all to peasants from feudal times?

That's when I start to get distinctly shitty.

In new blogs we trust

2010-10-15T21:08:00.001+01:00

It's been a bad few months for the libertarian/conservative/far right baby-eating extremist/anyone who won't do as they're told, blogospheres. The latest to move on being Radio Free Britain, who—completely understandably—have reached the conclusion that the time for jaw jaw is over. It's certainly understandable to me. I see no rollback in socialism as cited by some pro-coalition bloggers. I see us no better off financially, no better off in terms of imprisoning the real baddies instead of little old women unable to pay their (illegal) council taxes. I simply see no change at all. Do you? Only status quo. And if you do see real change on the streets around you, what is it?

The nature of Anna Raccoon's departure has left a bad taste in the mouth and those behind her quitting have robbed the internet of a place that stimulated the critical thinking beaten out of many of us by something governments like to call "education". Or as I'd rather call it, compliance training. For that's all it really is.

But it's very pleasing to see some new names have sprung up. The Grim Reaper (who's not grim all the time), Harbinger's Journal, Fuel Injected Moose, An Individual Voice, Woman on a Raft, Angry Teen (who stand as evidence that the indoctrination of youth can be trickier than it seems) and co-contributor to this blog Indyanhat, being just some of my newer blogroll additions and daily reads.

This is by no means an "out with the old" post. The blogosphere (or at least the side of it I read) is poorer for the losses of several highly readable names. This post is more an acknowledgement to the new thoughts, intellects, viewpoints and experiences whose owners have made themselves known in a far quicker time than I have.

But anyway—enough of the niceties ;-) I've got a bottle of red which isn't going to drink itself. I'll see you later. Probably when I'm hammered. I'll address any comment replies to "the one of you in the middle".

Grow a beard and buy a backpack

2010-10-12T09:00:00.000+01:00

"Run, you cowards!" being the operative words of instruction for this particular bunch of politicised police, who, truth be known, would be vilified for even looking these bearded freaks in the eye (and trust me, I don't have much time for the police at the moment).

But why? These are a benevolent, peaceful people, surely?

Funny, isn't it, that we have further violence on our streets due to two religions that in theory, should have fuck all to do with this place. Arguing over a conflict some 2,300 miles away from London. I wonder who keeps it in the news, endlessly...

I might have some idea.

H/T Indyanhat.

Why MP's always claim to "work hard"

2010-10-11T21:10:00.000+01:00

Because the negligent, unrepresentative pieces of shit ARE working hard. Often elsewhere (excuse NoTS linkage):

NINE out of 10 MPs are cashing in on second jobs - with one trousering more than £285,000 since May's election.

Some 563 of the 650 MPs - 87 per cent - have revealed incomes on top of their £64,766 Commons salaries.

Many work as highly-paid lawyers, directors and business advisors.

New Tory MP Stephen Phillips - a QC - has pocketed £285,150 for legal work in just five months since the election.

Fellow Tory Tony Baldry has stashed away £133,067 from directorships and legal work. In many cases he billed clients more than £1,000-an-hour.

But while his posh colleagues coined it in, Tory Robert Goodwill earned £100 for 10 hours' work as a tractor driver.

The first register of MPs' interests of the new Parliament also reveals:

Former Tory ministers Nicholas Soames and Sir Malcolm Rifkind each pocketed more than £17,500 a month from a series of directorships.

Ex-ministers Tim Yeo and John Redwood earned more than £10,000 a month, new Tory MP Jonathan Evans is paid £12,500 a month by a pensions firm and Tory Jacob Rees-Mogg gets £10,000 a month from an investment firm.

This post from Obnoxio becomes a lot harder to argue with.

Propa journalism, innit?

2010-10-10T21:00:00.001+01:00

Via Witterings from Witney, I find a quote from Andrew Marr; jug-eared freak, inseminator of anything with a vaguely (or even less vaguely) humanoid vagina and regular arse-kisser of all things Establishment:

"Most citizen journalism strikes me as nothing to do with journalism at all. A lot of bloggers seem to be socially inadequate, pimpled, single, slightly seedy, bald, cauliflower-nosed, young men sitting in their mother's basements and ranting. They are very angry people. OK – the country is full of very angry people. Many of us are angry people at times. Some of us are angry and drunk. But the so-called citizen journalism is the spewings and rantings of very drunk people late at night."

So tell me Andrew, when are you going to drag your publicly subsidised, competition-free arse out here to compete with losers like us in the blogosphere? Correct us. Assume the moral highground off the natural righteousness of your own litarary talents.

If we're significant enough to rant about from the Righteous Pulpit, we're doing something you don't like. Like perpetuating actual news and asking questions your bosses won't let you ask. Resentment is a horrible thing.

Fair enough, it's just an opinion. But you'd stand a far greater chance of getting an unorthodox contrary opinion through my comments section than you would through those of his employer.

So Andrew, who leads the way in terms of civility and modernity? Those who accept fresh opinions and the efforts of low-down minions out here in reality, or those who don't? That comfort blanket is fraying, old son. Best get us censored, eh?

Come back with something when you've lived in Harlesden, freak.

Who owns Britain?

2010-10-10T08:00:00.003+01:00

(Barring the obvious answer—namely the EU).

There's no need to splash out £104 on a copy of the paperback. You learn more or less everything you need to know about the Left's favourite term "social injustice" from this comment on the Amazon catalogue page:

This is a remarkable and original survey of landownership in Britain and Ireland, detailed county by county.

For Britain, Cahill analyses this landownership, showing how a tiny minority exploits British society. 160,000 families, 0.3% of the population, own 37 million acres, two thirds of Britain, 230 acres each. Just 1,252 of them own 57% of Scotland. They pay no land tax. Instead every government gives them £2.3 billion a year and the EU gives them a further £2 billion. Each family gets £26,875.

By contrast, 57.5 million of us pay £10 billion a year in council tax, a land tax, £550 per household. We live in 24 million homes on about four million acres. 65% of homes are privately owned, so 16 million of us own just 2.8 million acres, an average 0.18 acres each.

The top landowners are the Forestry Commission, 2.6 million acres, the Ministry of Defence 750,000, the royal family 670,000 (including the Crown Estate 400,000 and the Duchy of Cornwall 141,000), the National Trust 550,000, insurance companies 500,000, the utility companies 500,000, the Duke of Buccleuch 270,700, the National Trust for Scotland 176,287, the Dukedom of Atholl 148,000, the Duke of Westminster 140,000 and the Church of England 135,000.

The Forestry Commission, Britain's biggest single landowner, runs its holdings conservatively and secretively. We could expand the forest estate by a million acres a year, producing rural jobs, getting profits from the sale of wood and pulp (cutting our balance of payments deficit) and reducing the output of greenhouse gases. This would cost between £588 million and £750 million.

Through the 18th century enclosures, the landowning class stole eight million acres from the people. They still hide their crimes and their takings. The 1872 Return of Owners of Land was made, but then hidden and never updated. Shares have to be registered; land doesn't. The Land Registry does not know who owns between 30 and 50% of land.

Cahill compares Britain with other countries where revolutions have ended the feudal tenure of land. Denmark redistributed its land to the peasantry in 1800. In Ireland, in 1876, 616 landowners owned 80% of the country. By 1930, 13 million acres of Ireland's 20 million acres had been sold to owner-occupiers. Now, there are no landlords - home ownership is 82%, Ireland's 149,500 farms are 97% owner-occupied and owner-farmed, there is no poll tax, water is free and pensioners get free transport, TV and glasses.

Cahill claims that Blair's reform of the House of Lords "definitively cut the permanent link between power and the landowners." But just as in 1872, the state is defending landed capital by making it less visible. Class power does not depend on sitting in the House of Lords, but on private ownership of the means of production, protected and subsidised by a capitalist state. The Greens, like the heritage lobby, shield the landowners against public ownership of the land.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says its mission is to shift EU subsidies from food production to land management, but the EU already does this, with its £2 billion annual subsidy to the landowners, not to working farmers. We need to produce our own food: food production is in our national strategic interest. It is a national security issue that must not be determined either by the EU or by the market.

Landowners' wealth is a parasite on Britain, the least productive part of the economy, with the most state support. Their wealth comes not from farming, nor even from renting, but from trickling land onto the urban housing market. They sell land to property developers, at an average price per acre of £404,000 in 1999. The clearing banks and building societies strip our industries of investment capital, then support their clients the landowners by running the rigged and overpriced land market.

Britain needs land reform. "Windfall gains on development land should be made subject to windfall taxes." We should also tax land and stop the owners avoiding tax through offshore trusts; this could raise £17 billion. The European Convention of Human Rights says there should be no confiscation without compensation. Haven't landowners had enough compensation already? We need more land for housing. This would cut land prices, free more to invest in good quality, spacious homes and gardens, and revive the building industry.

You can gather further info from the book's accompanying website.

H/T comments at Old Holborn.

UPDATE: Captain Ranty (via comments) has informed me the book is for sale on Play.com for the considerably more reasonable price of £10.99.

Have. Eat.

2010-10-09T16:45:00.004+01:00

Leg-iron draws my attention to yet another individual afflicted by a mixture of self righteousness, "me me me" syndrome, and a single digit IQ to boot. And, it seems, no desire to do anything beyond milk the system.

This woman is a Muslim convert—and apparently, a very devout one at that—(as is often the way with converts proving their "purity" to 13th century goat herders) who is so purely Islamic that she found it a great affront to her and her religion to be asked to remove her veil whilst giving evidence in court against her violent ex-partner.

The Born Again One, a Miss Georgina Richards, is up the duff for only the fourth time. Her religious choice, and the strictness of it would have earned her four deadly stonings (presumably to run concurrently). That's the Sharia for you.

But she doesn't want that. She also doesn't want to have to face up to at least two males against her sole testimony or level accusations of a serious crime with her face exposed like the rest of us cultural vermin have to.

Nor does she want to be beaten by her Sharially Unlawful partner. All things which she'd have to accept were it not for the relative liberty of the British Law system for which she carries so little respect for under normal circumstances. Because that's our culture—a culture good enough to attract millions of people persecuted by laws and systems such as Sharia Law (among others).

And it's Sharia law she's become loyal to (we'd have thought). In much the same way as I—as a Brit—don't adhere to Spanish law or Nigerian law or any other kind of law for the simple reason that they are not the laws of this land.

I think it's pretty reasonable to suggest that if one adopts a foreign (and wholly less civilised) culture and set of laws, one should take them all—as a set. Especially when it's an all-encapsulating set like Sharia and especially when it costs taxpayers money for one to pick and choose the bits one likes.

British or not, this stupid bitch should have been sent packing. To Saudi, as these aren't our laws, they're theirs. Although, having said that, former British borough Tower Hamlets do a good line in apparently Righteous-approved Sharia justice. It's called Sharia Law for a reason. One has to obey it, or face punishment by one's fellow man. Choose a shit set and you'll inevitably end up in the shit.

I await the inevitable wave of psuedo civil liberties guff to begin emanating from the Marxist scum at Liberal Conspiracy and Left Foot Forward.

Liberal Conspiracy goes Daily Mail

2010-10-09T00:40:00.001+01:00

Bit of a thicko. Probably supports Millwall and attends"knife and fork" lessons

Dave Osler *—you and your "good lady" are irresponsible, self entitled muppets with not a brain cell or a clue between you.

Wear a cape, you whining, wannabe-middle-class idiot.

That link to total cuntitudal cuntyality again *.

Anyone else want to ram a rusty cheesegrater up this fuckwit's nose? I'll leave the discussion bit up to you. Unlike Liberal Conspiracy, I don't moderate.

* (links now open in new windows / tabs).

Cultural Marxism for dummies

2010-10-08T18:55:00.003+01:00

UPDATE: Harbinger (via comments) has passed on a link to the full video (in one piece) on Google Vids.

UPDATE 2: Fuck it. I'll replace the fragmented YouTube efforts and embed it.

A film that could do with a wider audience (regular readers will probably be familiar, but a recap can never hurt). I thought I'd do my little bit.

"Tolerant society" revisited

2010-10-08T01:40:00.002+01:00

Another one of the many recent happenings I didn't pass comment (and am possibly ignorant) on is the now infamous book burning by a couple of EDL members last month.

Recently, however, I've had my attention drawn to a post on a blog called "One Million United (in smashing thoughtcrime and bringing about the Leninist Dream)".

Let's examine:

We could have told the English Defence League that burning Korans on September 11th – when even rampant hate-preacher, Pastor Terry Jones had reneged on this idea – was not going to end well for them.

So could I. In fact, I could tell anyone that investing in property to merely set fire to it whilst it was still in good nick generally makes for a pretty poor allocation of financial investment. All things being equal, they could tell me it was their loss financially, and suggest I had more pressing issues to worry about. Which I do. And so does everyone else. No really. I mean everyone.

Of course, the police have caught up with those involved in the book burning by EDL members in Gateshead last weekend. Several members were arrested and detained while their houses and PCs were searched, then later released on bail. They are due to appear in court to answer charges of incitement in November.

It'd be a police issue if the books had been stolen. But the UAF shills' blog cleverly omits that sort of a detail. It still looks to me like a few blokes setting fire to an item of property they'd come by lawfully. Correct me in the comments if I'm wrong.

As usual, the EDL are up in arms, making claims ranging from the ludicrous, ‘They did not burn the books, they posted a video of someone else doing it’, to attacking the police and CPS for being efficient enough to catch these criminals and make them face justice for their actions.

Them being criminals insofar as they set something alight that presumably—from the allusion (or omission) in the article at least—one of them had paid for and acquired lawful ownership of. And their "actions" being nothing more than setting fire to a lawful purchase, as stated. What next? Throwing the (unburning) book at blokes betting on the wrong horse?

It still looks like men setting fire to a book one of them had paid for. All the more, seeing as most Imams generally charge for copies of the Koran. Ruth Rendall and Waterstones—you're next!

It seems the EDL’s day [sic] really are numbered now, as more and more often these raids on their homes and computer equipment are being carried out by counter-terrorism squads and CID.

And I'm PAYING for this shit? I'm paying for a bunch of "thought criminals" (acting lawfully, it seems) to have their computers seized by the Pigs (and be infected with kiddie porn in some cases, no doubt) because they disagree with the glorious UAF's "vision" of a Sharian Utopia that kills homosexuals and packs women off back to the kitchen and the bedroom on demand, at pain of a beating? I thought these were anti-fascists (OK - I didn't really).

And these cunts want us to pay for this when their Socialist heroes are advocating softer laws (or probably non-existent laws) against child porn?

In [the video], one idiot – clearly ignorant to the inner workings of accelerants (ed: thank Socialist education for that) – can be seen clearly pouring petrol on the already well ignited fire, risking serious injury to himself in the process. His friends, all dressed in headscarves, laugh as they look on.

Awwww. So they do care after all. One would have suspected that it wouldn't bother the UAF too much if an EDL member blew himself to smithereens. In fact, given past precedence, one would also suspect that'd improve his image of modernity and diversity of interest in the eyes of the UAF.

So, competition time: what the fuck was the point of this attempted thought-regulating, Establishment-echoing article and why? If you're really good, you'll get a government-sponsored Internet Police job and the right to grass up rural train platform smokers for entry to Newhaven's new incinerator.

Another case of ladders and "Baaaaaaaa!", we'd have thought.

Cum dogging

2010-10-07T21:35:00.001+01:00

It'd be a (hate) crime to object (excuse Daily Wail linkage):

Police have been ordered to stop anyone taking in part in illegal outdoor sex being abused or verbally taunted as it can cause them to suffer post traumatic stress.

An extraordinary new Hate Crime Guidance Manual has been handed to officers telling them to arrest anyone suspected of committing a hate crime against those engaged in ‘dogging’.

Although it notes that outdoor sex can have an ‘impact on the quality of life of people using these locations for leisure pursuits’ - for example dog walkers and tourists - the rights of those cottaging, cruising or dogging must be taken into account by officers.

I don't notice any mention in this cracking new Cultural Marxist, Freudian, pansexual supplement stating that perhaps—just perhaps—~~freaks~~ doggers might be inclined to get a little abusive themselves when disturbed at near boiling point whilst rolling around in a bed of nettles.

No new hate crime legislation stating the rights of dog walkers, picnickers and those with children with them to NOT be abused by butt-naked "exhibitionists". Or even shocked, by the sight of a punctured rectum. As usual, it supports the lowest common, attention seeking, weird, and dare I say, a tad deviant, denominator. Probably because that's what the Establishment like to generalise as "constituency work" when they're not available on the phone.

But then again, the report is from the ACPO. A fatter, more overfed, overpaid and more political ladder climbing group I never did see.

Don't think it's Cultural Marxism worming its way ever further into our broken society? They'll be calling for the watering down of child pornography laws next. Heh!

Bang your drum

2010-10-05T21:00:00.000+01:00

* This is not an innuendo post *

I neglected to post on matters Splattergate. Not because of any agreement with the totalitarian, greed-inspired agenda behind it, but because I'd sooner not offer publicity (albeit tiny, in my case) to a group who I'm sure would be begrudgingly grateful for it. And let's face it—they now have it. Even after it was pulled before official airing, it's now (finally) all over the papers.

The truth is, the more I watch those on the far authoritarian left, the more I realise they get off on notoriety, controversy and, with few exceptions, timing. It makes them the "happening group" at any given time on any given issue. At their most benevolent, they're backstage planning something for tomorrow.

I quite enjoyed doing my little bit in laying into the protagonists behind the "Ciggy Busters" campaign. But that was easy. Even in today's upside-down Socialist utopia, it's not difficult to persuade the majority of indoctrinated sheep who frequent the few pubs we have left that stealing highly taxed property off other individuals is wrong. Very, very wrong. And that those behind such an idea deserve a lifetime of derision and ostracism from decent society. By decent society.

The "global climate disruption" beast is a different animal altogether. Somehow, somewhere, the doublethink kicked in. Talk to people about it. They'll tell you the climate is a highly complex, cyclical mechanism. The same as I believe. The same as anyone with more than two brain cells to knock together believes. Yet they'll accept the highly simplistic prognosis of a bunch of UN/government funded scientists as to why they should accept The Word when it comes to a theory that will only benefit the UN, governments and big business.

How does this happen?

Being controversial and against the status quo as per the opinions of media-indoctrinated drones is fun and rejuvenating. Being a rebel is fun and rejuvenating. It draws attention to oneself (often profitable attention, too. Any publicity. Just remember Fat Poof Dale's hissy directed at the entire blogosphere over Paul Staines' antics re Hague) and as one or two of my more "controversial" posts have proved, it garners a hell of a lot of attention. Just ask Leg Iron. And when you're having fun, you're simply more effective, although obviously there are some exceptions.

The crux of what I'm trying to get at is that the game hasn't really changed at all. Not since the 1960's (well before I was born—seeing as you ask). And it was probably played by similar rules before that. We've just learnt the rules.

Learn when to bang your drum. And when you've held off long enough for the silence to be painfully deafening, beat the crap out of it with absolute abandon. Bare-chested. Those are the standards we've been set, and they're clinically proven to work.

Just like Marxists, we can stand on the shoulders of idiots. But we cost less.

Terry Kelly wipes his fat arse on the hand that feeds him AGAIN

2010-09-28T13:50:00.003+01:00

UPDATE: Others are watching the fat cunt's latest alleged antics closely

A portrait by Gotty.

You may have noticed that I've failed to acknowledge Terry's position of councillor in the title. That's because he's not a councillor, or indeed a public servant of any denomination whatsoever.

His latest article doesn't make for much of a read. But then again, not many of his do. However, whilst bleating on about the plight of the"travelling communities" in areas of the world he's probably never been to, an anonymous commenter leaves the following:

What a load of mince Mr Kelly. The travellers had nice places built for them, one on the Hurlet Road is a good example and they just wrecked them, fiddled the electricity meters by making 50p's out of ice etc and left the place a dirty mess so it ended up being shut down. Oh mustn't forget they also conned my pensioner mother out of £300 and the police didn't want to know because they were travellers.

Typical that you stick up for them instead of the decent people like my mother and your constituents. I see over in the Paisley Expressions that they are highlighting you for exactly the same thing. These travellers thieve evrything they can when they are in the area so it should not surprise me or anyone else that you stick up for them the same way you stick up for your councillor friend Williams over your voters.

So his constituent is reporting that fraud has taken place, and because of the lifestyle choice of the suspected miscreant(s), the police did nothing. Now a proper public servant would be keen to investigate the validity of this complaint before proceeding to collect the contituent's information—plus the details of the incident—and subsequently relay the matter onto the local MP if a good enough case has been made.

But as I said, Terry isn't a public servant. He merely fattens his numerous arses on public money.

He consults his book of stock Righteous insults and ejaculates thus:

Among our own local people we have those who wreck their houses: fiddle the electric meters: and leave a mess everywhere, we also have no shortage of those who would rob your pensioner mother if they got the chance.

To suggest that Travellers are more likely to break the law is a classic example of racist bigotry. You should go away and polish your ‘Jackboots’

So, a constituent of his reports a crime, claims to have tried the police and been given the short shrift, and is now reporting this crime to a man in public office with the contacts and supposed influence to relay that information upwards and have it investigated properly.

Terry, being the fat, lazy, self important, yet utter no-mark lardarse that he is, not only dismisses his constituent's complaint but proceeds to call him a Nazi for reporting a common law crime that the police he funds have neglected to go near. Presumably, as he's too bone idle to get off his several arses and waddle across the room to the fax machine. It's easier to remain seated and scream "you dirty RACIST!" Again, whilst we assume he's happy to fatten himself off the fruits of his constituent's labours.

Not only that, but he justifies his odious position by stating it's OK because a few locals *might* steal from the constituent's mother too.

I *might* just drop a couple of fat, smelly curly wurlies all over Terry's flowerbed, because let's face it—as the local stray cats *might* do the same, the standard has been set.

My hatred of all authority (no matter how pathetically unauthoritative they are) continues...

Guess who

2010-09-28T01:00:00.001+01:00

A speech has been made.

Today I want to talk about why I believe we, as foreign policy practitioners, need to up our game in building a credible and effective response to climate change. Climate change is perhaps the twenty-first century’s biggest foreign policy challenge along with such challenges as preventing the spread of nuclear weapons [ed: especially Iranian ones. Let's have war]. A world which is failing to respond to climate change is one in which the values embodied in the UN will not be met. It is a world in which competition and conflict will win over collaboration.

We are at a crucial point in the global debate on climate change. Many are questioning, in the wake of Copenhagen, whether we should continue to seek a response to climate change through the UN and whether we can ever hope to deal with this enormous [ponzi] challenge.

I will first argue that an effective response to climate change underpins our security and prosperity. Second, our response should be to strive for a binding global deal, whatever the setbacks. And third, I will set out why effective deployment of foreign policy assets is crucial to mobilising the political will needed if we are to shape an effective response.

The car being the exact same blacked-out windscreen model as previously driven, and the driver looking more or less the same too, minus the gurning and young female assistant-seeking snot missiles...

UN appoints alien outreach coordinator

2010-09-26T20:30:00.001+01:00

No, really. They can't waste money fast enough.

Aliens who landed on earth and asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed to Mrs Othman.

Because aliens all speak English.

The 58-year-old is expected to tell delegates that the proposal has been prompted by the recent discovery of hundreds of planets orbiting other starts, which is thought to make the discovery of extraterrestrial life more probable than ever before.

Is that a recent discovery? Or has Winston Smith just been working overtime this month?

Mrs Othman is currently head of the UN’s little known Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa) [ed: Apparently this office is two quadrillion light years away though. So I wouldn't bother sending a letter of complaint if I were prudent with my time and stampage].

Ah, now we get to the meat. How long until we're down to pay for extra-terrestrial "poverty" and intergalactic alien-made climate change? Perhaps Monbiot will get to keep his job after all.

In a recent talk to fellow scientists, she said: “The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials.

“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't take advice from the UN about where to put a table (although I've got a few ideas...). And as to these "sensitivities": given the context in which we're familiar with that term, are we to assume that any lesbian, Muslim, Somali and "non able-bodied" aliens are to be assigned special priority for council housing?

Opinion is divided about how future extraterrestrial visitors should be greeted.

How about we just give them a lend of the mobile blower? That's if they don't disintegrate completely and turn into clouds of purple smoke on entering our atmosphere.

Under the Outer Space Treaty on 1967, which Unoosa oversees, UN members agreed to protect Earth against contamination by alien species by “sterilising” them.

Eugenics never really went away. Still, hopefully the illegal aliens grabbed themselves a copy of Agenda 21 and will give our humble abode a wide berth.

Mrs Othman is understood to support a more tolerant approach.

Yes. Instead of schools teaching the cheeeldren only about socialism and lesbians, they'll now learn about socialism, lesbians and not causing "offence" to aliens. Because they're people too.

But Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that alien interlopers should be treated with caution.

He said: “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”

Stephen, I've got one word for you: retirement.

We are run by the mafia

2010-09-26T06:00:00.002+01:00

I picked up the below video from fraser's new blog (he has a knack of digging them up).

Its narrative is a line of thought I've found myself getting a lot closer to in recent times.

Most of our population do live in an illusion; in an imaginary bubble where politicians fix the country (we fix the country by living productive, lawful, self sufficient, fulfilled lives—politicians fuck it up royally), where different parties have different policies in key areas, where money never runs out, where we have liberty, where we have a free press and where we have an impartial state broadcaster.

UPDATE: I've just started reading this (H/T to Trooper Thompson and the All Seeing Eye via the comments).

Er, not quite

2010-09-25T12:26:00.001+01:00

In recent weeks we've seen stories of hamsters being microwaved and dogs being burned alive in cages. Even the story of the woman who binned the cat could have lead to cruel, painful and possibly fatal consequences.

This however, isn't one of those stories.

Headline screams:

Who turned this kitten into the Pink Panther?: Yobs leave animal so bright it glows in the dark

And they must be yobs because they dyed a cat pink? Would the Wail be so accomodating to such a headline next time Crufts comes round?

Ah..

'The person responsible has covered her all over but avoided putting any round her eyes and nose.'

The cat, thought to have been a stray or deserted pet, was earlier unharmed by the guerilla grooming session.

And:

'Pink has been dyed very evenly and the person has taken care to ensure it did not get in her eyes or mouth so I think it may have been done professionally,' she said.

So one would have thought the more disturbing aspect of this was that the cat was probably a stray who'd been thrown out onto the street, rather than someone deciding to give it a new hairdo whilst taking extra special care to avoid stinging its eyes.

So, where are these hoodies again? I'm off to peruse the rest of the day's stories in the Wail. There's got to be a dustbin story somewhere...

Ahmadinejad - a gutsy so-and-so?

2010-09-25T00:30:00.002+01:00

You decide.

I reproduce in full (with permission) a post from The Talking Clock. A very good, mixed read if you've not stumbled across it before:

You have to hand it to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad... the man certainly has balls.

Constantly faced with pressure from the world's largest power, the United States—and most of the globe, thinking about it—he's a man who seldom seems to run scared.

And guess what? He's done it again.

Yes, a controversial figure leading a nation with more than a few question marks over their record on human rights - not that we can criticise, after what was done in our name under New Labour.

But one has to take their hat off to a man who can stand up in front of all of the world's leaders at the U.N. and state calmly that 9/11 was an inside job.

The Daily Express online report quotes him as saying that: "some segments within the US government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view".

Voice of America cites him as claiming that "most people around the world" believe that the atrocity was a staged event, instigated by the U.S. Government.

In the United States, 1317 verified architectural and engineering professionals have signed a petition demanding a fresh and totally independent investigation into the events of 11th September 2001.

Civil liberties around the world have been clamped down upon as a consequence of the New York atrocities, with a global control infrastructure being imposed upon the people by an ever more powerful and remote elite, taking decisions at a global level unfettered by democracy or public opinion.

No news whatsoever

2010-09-24T01:15:00.000+01:00

Where did it all go?

We've got Vince (I'd love to wrap a) Cable (round his scrawny neck, the mad scientist lookalike) repeating hardline Labour spiel insofar as to deflect "spivdom" away from the frequenters of the smoking bar in our fucking house in Westminster and onto bankers who lent money as they were told, to make us all middle class now, as per Prescott's "vision". If only Gordon had had that vision. Then things may have been only half as bad. And on one side.

We've got yet more pontification about how we "must do more for Africa", despite the fact the Powers That Be are more than happy to keep Africa indebted to them (yes, I say them, not us. They took responsibility, yet it's us paying). Let's just keep that money in transit, eh? To be syphoned off by various suited, booted, "commission" seeking scum. The money always has to be moving. This is one thing I've learned.

Lots of Ban Ki Moon on the Beeb website. I never thought he'd surpass Kofi Annan in the champagne hypocrisy whilst wearing a windproof jacket in 18 degrees on a moored boat for the cameras stakes. But he's trying. Get face cancer, you money grubbing, Bilderberg shitbag. Or at least, a successor to the Bilderbergs. There's a reason why the Bilderberg group have garnered a couple of minor mentions in the MSM of late. Might it be that the UN are the new, GM version?

Oh, and The Forehead repeats the Gorgon's line of how our streets are much, much safer since our overlords decided to invade Afghanistan for their "crop" and mineral resources to fend off the non-globalist Taliban (who paid, again?). Still, at least they're consistent when it comes to nationalists. And 7/7 never happened. Bereaved relatives merely imagined it.

I say there IS some kind of conspiracy going on to repeat the same old lies to a point where we simply won't kick up a stink anymore. And now that it is so, how can any of these despicable, murderous, dictatorial, thieving, empire building, feudal bastards ever criticise Goebbels? They're ALL using his methods. Constantly.

I enjoyed my week off. Evidently those who purport to rule over us, steal from us, bully us, invade whoever has the most natural resources (at OUR expense and WITHOUT our permission) and pander to the idea of a global government enjoyed the week more. And no protests. No riots. Just Normality And The Mondeo.

The big government leftists will be pleased. But not for long. I've taken a cold winter in Eastern Europe with next to no heating. And I hear Hampstead is due a cold snap in a couple of winters' time...

Oh, to be a useful idiot.

A book worth reading

2010-09-15T23:55:00.001+01:00

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits.

Matthew 7: 15-16

Fabian logo and Biblical stuff from here.

I've been reading the downloadable PDF version of Sean Gabb's Cultural Revolution, Culture War and it really brings home just how deep New Marxism runs within our government, our institutions (read: the BBC, skools innit bruv?, police, universities and museums) and also our local and independent "authorities".

It's an older version of the book (2007) but spends a couple of the latter chapters explaining possible solutions for reversing the deliberate damage inflicted on us all by Fabians. However nothing in it will really shock you, given the current state of Britain.

It's also nice and easy to comprehend whilst pissed out of one's skull. Just bloody depressing. Recommended.

The Communist West

2010-09-14T20:47:00.000+01:00

I'm a bit late to the party with this one, but highly recommend you watch it if you've not stumbled across it yet.

It's proof that socialists never stop stamping on the faces of the proletariat. Not content with all the facets of Communism that we already live under (as highlighted by the AntiTerrorist in the below video), they still want more. They still want a bigger, more controlling government.

And why? Because all of Communism's (and Socialism's) advocates dream of being at the top. There, they can conserve their energy, eat excessively and get rich, while other useful idiots take up the jackboots, put them on, and continue stamping until they've created the feudal, bloody society it took us so long to work our way away from.

All for the men at the top, and driven by over-confidence, indoctrination and brain-deadness.

Happy viewing.

I hope it becomes apparent after watching this just why I've spewed so much bile over one of two of the more sanctimonious Righteous bloggers over the last couple of months. They don't just advocate all of this, daily—they want even more. And they want us to have even less. Much less.

(Via Harbinger).

Looks like rain

2010-09-11T02:30:00.001+01:00

At long last.

I've got a week off awaiting me, after a long, hard slog earning tax for my "protectors" to pay for a couple of wars I don't agree with and was never asked my views on despite my money being used to fund them, some lazy people (who don't vote anyway) to sit around breeding for profit and belching Stella, the Tower Hamlets Lesbian Gay Islamo-Jew One-Legged With a Hump Back and Sexually Confused Tent Wearing Contest 2010, and free (twelve course) dinners for unaccountable, Eric Pickles-sized cunts in ill-fitting suits and Gordon Gekko braces.

As for the *other* money I earned — utilising my one or two technologically based talents; that's hidden. And will stay hidden. It's guarded by two crossbows, a longbow, an unloaded shotgun and a drunken soak with a bad temper. It doesn't need to be well hidden.

I don't fancy the Cleggeron Coagulation's * chances of getting to it beforehand. Don Shenker certainly isn't, and it'd really pain him to learn that my secondary job payments arrive in the form of home brewed wine and are perfectly lawful. And, I believe, perfectly "legal" too. Actually, it probably isn't. But I don't care. Who's to decide what a "favour" is? The Mafia seem to do OK based on that...

So I might be around a little bit more this week — much to your disappointment, I'm sure.

* Leg Iron smithed this wordsmithery, I think.

Afghan anger over 'Koran burning' in Kandahar

2010-09-09T02:07:00.002+01:00

FUCK!!!

Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to America's shores on September 11, 2001, and to ours on July 7th 2005 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania, then on London tube trains and buses later on?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day in New York, or didn't they?

And the many more people in London, all for some stone age cause?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Yanks are gonna burn some book or other, and the Taliban are angry?

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11 and 7/7.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind women and children.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of Nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the BBC stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a British soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take this to the bank:

I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner - who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special food' that is paid for by my taxes - is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, believe me!! you guessed it ......

I don't care!!

Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. Our soldiers don't have that problem, and so as for your politically correct opinion on Islamic human rights, hear me now...

I dont care!

Child abuse

2010-09-06T18:42:00.002+01:00

Here's what they're doing to children throughout the Western world. Far Left Communists and their useful idiots with a totalitarian agenda doing exactly what a Far Left Fascist and his useful idiots were doing in the 1930s.

Look at the hatred in the eyes. Listen to the way he spews all this having evidently been given no proof whatsoever to back up these claims. Only repetition. He's known nothing else and not been shown how to find it.

Captain Ranty is right. These are the children of Mr and Mrs Normal.

(Via the Filthy Engineer).

For no other reason than to piss off Julia Middleton, with a video she had "Banned" early last Year

2010-09-05T05:05:00.002+01:00

Censorship free video uploading site - and WHY

2010-09-03T21:00:00.003+01:00

The All Seeing Eye has been busy developing a site that you can actually upload videos to without government and quango approval and intervention (yes Neil Lees, I'm looking at you, you scrawny wimp. Defend yourself in the comments here someday, Comrade. We'd love to hear from you [for once]).

EyeTube is the name. Free speech is the game. The site being inspired by numerous successful attempts at censorship directed at GrumpyOldTwat (amongst others) over on RighteousTube, for daring to express opinions contrary to those of the Guardian, the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation, radical Islamists, the EU and Common Purpose.

The irony being, that this same Communist inspired "people power" brigade that keep flagging videos for censorship on YouTube, have actually inspired some real people power. They won't like that one bit because it's not controlled people power.

But fortunately for us, it appears the administrators of this website don't give two hoots for the manic button-pressing abilities of a bunch of middle class Marxist control freaks, poofs, Islamic fundamentalists and doggers from Hampstead with school governors for parents and shit for brains.

Should be fun!

Any publicity...

2010-09-02T19:43:00.002+01:00

I'm not actually that bothered about the shitstorm that's kicked off about Guido's "innuendo laden attacks" on Hague. I generally don't read Guido anyway, as I can't be bothered with gossip and the Westminster Village scene. I'm far happier taking aim at Righteous types and launching them into orbit. And providing a white canvas for you all to lend your support to them on... Ahem ;-)

Trust me, it's fun. It's liberating. I just enjoy kicking fat, sanctimonious, publicly funded arses after a bad day at work funding their fat, sanctimonious, publicly funded arses. Being stolen from, so to speak.

Iain Dale's multitude of appearances on telly, and on BBC radio, have only served to promote the political blogosphere through "notoriety". I don't mean backwater ones like this. But bigger fish, who at some time or another, will link to smaller fish.

And Iain Dale is publishing his Total Politics rankings at the moment. So all is not lost (it could be, morally speaking, but whilst our governments couldn't care less about morals, neither could I. Reap the whirlwind).

So thanks Iain, you big fat cuddly poof ;-)

What's the point of Don Shenker, again?

2010-09-01T19:01:00.000+01:00

I've just found an interesting article. 'People should smoke and drink more’, says Russian finance minister.

By all accounts, it seems this is to raise further cash for a burgeoning welfare state (who'da guessed?). But the above statement from the finance minister comes soon after this:

The finance ministry in June announced plans to more than double excise duty on cigarettes over the next three years from 250 roubles (£5.30) per 1,000 filtered cigarettes to 590 roubles (£12.50) in 2013.

And:

The state recently imposed a new minimum legal price for vodka, implemented a zero tolerance ban on drink-driving and banned night-time sales of alcohol to curb abuse blamed for the deaths of thousands of Russians every year [ed: to any Russians reading this — we get those articles too).

Watch your back, Shenker. And other assorted Health Righteous too. Perhaps Don knows this, and is making hay while the sun shines.

A little Righteous bastard with small man's disease

2010-08-27T21:45:00.004+01:00

The man with the small man in him

I'd like you to meet Tristan.

Tristan is a Labour luvvy who spends most of his time slamming the Tory/Lib Dem run council of Medway on his largely unread blog. However, when it comes to his pet prejudice — the prohibitionist movement of the twenty first century — all of a sudden, he's all over them.

His money quote (see above link) is here. See what you think of his little analogy:

The Libertarian argument that someone has the right to smoke in a confined public space, where it can harm others is mad, just as the argument that someone has the right to rape, hit or harm someone else by violence.

I'm not even going to suggest that he is linking me to rapists. Or that he is insinuating that when I walk into a private space — that I could possibly be kicked out of by the proprietor — (yes, Tristan, pubs aren't officially owned by the State - yet), I go about my business thumping and stabbing people.

Because that would be wrong, for they are trapped in their seats in that ~~public~~ private space and are not at all free to get up and find somewhere where I won't rape, thump and stab them (i.e. sit down with a pint and a newspaper, and light a small paper tube with some dried leaf in it, which my own, nationally insured lungs do a handy job of filtering).

Tristan doesn't use the word "private" very often. To Tristan, everything is "public", which as he well knows, means in that instance it's bossed by the government and he is one who aspires to govern. Win! Get in there, Tris! You shortarse, authoritarian, bossy little fuck.

Let's look at that sentence again:

just as the argument that someone has the right to rape, hit or harm someone else by violence.

I'm not aware of such an argument being put forth by the pro small government set. Are you? And for someone not keen on the idea (and, for that matter, neither am I) of us all having the right to assault one another, he's extremely keen to endorse the "ciggy busters", who — unless I'm very much fucking mistaken — assaulted, or at least endorsed and promoted the idea of assault and theft.

Another classic example of how the methods of this insidious, stumpy little cunt (and those he aspires to be like) are working wonders is in the comments. An anonymong turns up, bleating along the lines of "don't ban me, ban THEM!" with regards to people drinking in public:

I wonder if the 'ciggy busting' approach will be used against the public drinkers who in my experience cause more problems than any public smoker!

Suffice to say, Tristan's all over that:

Anon - absolutely agree that alcoholism is a major problem. The Channel 4 programme covered this last night. Again we need to legislate to give Councils more power on licensing and force alcohol providers to be more aware of the social impacts of alcoholism. In the very least establishments should be contributing to the security of the surrounding area. Whilst I do not agree with the coalition on its rhetoric on 24 hour drinking, in practice they are proposing some sensible measures to support local government. Previous licence laws were correct in riding ourselves of the 11pm curfew but were wrong to allow the legal profession to challenge local councillors and communities on what they considered to be fair opening hours. The Labour Government was afraid that more liberal laws would be just opposed so the legislation favoured bars and clubs. This needs to be reversed.

Who said anything about alcoholism? This twat is equating a half pint of Fosters ('orrible, rat piss-like stuff) on a sunny summer's evening to a full blown addiction. No middle ground. Drinkers are alcoholics. That's right. Even those pensioners you see picking up a quarter of Sainsbury's own whisky to last them all week are dangerous, feral addicts.

Tristan, the Labour socialist, is also obsessed with money (predictably). And how to make it. He graduated from Durham with a masters in Business and Economics. Eeeeeeevil big business, eh? All whilst maintaining wholeheartedly he's centre left and frightfully trendy.

And, from early impressions, he sure as shit sounds centre left, the hypocritical little fuck. If he had a neck, it'd be made of solid brass.

WANKER.

As always, when documenting the activities of those who wish to rule us with a rod of iron, I welcome scathing comments and will add any other juicy info you dig up to the post itself. Or do a completely new one if it's juicy enough ;-)

Oh, and PS, for a little amusement: having seen Tris, staunch middle class Labour luvvy, defend a Lib Dem council, here's a Lib Dem condemning them. What fun!

UPDATE: After a commenter seemingly jokingly suggested Tristan had shot us all down in flames, Dick Puddlecote offered comment at his place. Great summary, says I:

Anon @ 19:51: No he didn't. Let's list what he did do, in order.

Prologue: Only published comments he chose

1) Employed emotive nonsense to avoid facing a plain fact about his party's changed attitude towards the working class.

2) Refused to acknowledge evidence contrary to his opinion, instead choosing to talk about primary smoking, which isn't in question.

3) Fell back to the typical socialist position of denying that Nazism employed left wing policies. While simultaneously, err, arguing that a denormalisation of law-abiding people is acceptable (see the irony there?).

4) Answered a comment about the poor record of doctors by saying that doctors must be trusted (and again pointing to primary smoking which no-one challenged).

5) Avoided accusations of using a straw man by trotting out another.

6) Showed an ignorance that those who "have undertaken decades of research" are not actually "qualified scientists and clinicians" but instead, number-crunchers and, in the case of the most famous in the world, aircraft engineers.

7) Agreeing that a theft may have been committed if, as the teacher herself has admitted, members of the public had their property stolen (it's still unclear if these arrogant kids gave the fags back afterwards).

8) The one where he actually listened and had some semblance of a point.

9) "In a private property or house, absolutely no problem" - Pubs are privately owned.

Epilogue: Whereas before he deliberately talked about primary smoking - and its incontrovertible harms - when challenged about passive smoking, here he switches it round to talk about passive smoking in the open air, which no scientist has ever shown to be a danger. Just to remind you, the Ciggy Busters operated in a High Street.

Apart from that, yeah, the guy done great.

Now, if he could just remember the adage "don't believe all you read in the Graun" or Labour manifestos, he could be a decent writer.

As things stand though, he's an ignorant tool.

We like

2010-08-27T13:27:00.003+01:00

H/T Angry Exile

Just for fucking fun

2010-08-26T21:00:00.000+01:00

The real issues hitting the country right now, courtesy of Cuntcillor Terry Kelly (No copyright notice on his site. If he won't provide free speech, I will. Go to school on it, as I know he reads me).

Friday 20/08/10 - 2 PM, to Reid Kerr College to meet; question and listen to Ed. Milliband as he takes his mobile hustings around the country. Readers who are astute enough to visit my site regularly will know that I will be voting for Dianne Abbott; the voting however will be carried out by stating your preferences and numbering them. A process of elimination will then follow so; I took the chance to listen to another candidate, notwithstanding my declared preference for first past the post the experience was worthwhile. I have always taken the view that it is well nigh impossible to find a candidate for anything with whom you will find yourself in total agreement and so it proved with Ed. Milliband, and Ms. Abbott and the others for that matter. There is only ever one candidate who fits that bill and that is our good selves. [ed: Yup. So tell your overlords to fucking leave us alone, fatboy]

The famously taciturn American President Calvin Coolidge returned from worship services one day, “what did the preacher preach on asked his wife “Sin,” he replied. “Well, what did he say about it,” she continued. “He was agin it!” Coolidge answered.

So it was with Ed. Milliband he was predictably in favour of most things his audience were for and “agin” what they were “agin” This loosely tends to be the case with most political parties, their leaders and members, excluding of course the likes of the SNP, BNP and SSP [ed:smear much, old chap?] where dissent is as rare as a rocking horse's s***e; otherwise we would not have political parties. It falls therefore to the individual to do some research on the candidates because it would be very unlikely that someone would decide on who to vote for based only on a hustings meeting. The wretched coverage of the leader’s debate at the last election where the now exposed Clegg was given the hard sell from the deviant British media only to crash and burn on Election Day was handy proof of that.

Back to Milliband minor however; he is as expected a very impressive candidate with an encyclopaedic knowledge of the issues, unruffled; friendly and incandescently bright. The standard of candidates in fact for this leadership election is very high indeed and he did not let himself down as he took questions from everyone on any subject even including what music and books he liked. He famously comes of course from a kind of family that are considered “left wing royalty” [ed: I thought lefties hated royalty] with radical left wing Jewish parents who fled Nazi Occupied Europe. His dad will be no stranger to anyone who like me is a political anorak. Ralph Milliband was a political historian and thinker of huge authority he was also a Marxist as was their mother, Milliband raised a huge laugh when asked which brother she would vote for when he answered “neither, she will vote for Dianne Abbott”

Our diligent,hard working Labour MP Jim Sheridan arranged this meeting and the members and other invited guests raised a varied set of questions; it was a robust, and friendly exchange of views and the standard of questions and knowledge of our society and political ideas demonstrated by those present was very impressive indeed. Ed. Milliband enjoyed the meeting as did those who attended; there is no substitute for hearing statements and opinions from the horse’s mouth rather than having to rely on the rancid bias of our media and that proved to be a breath of fresh air as well.

The running order for my vote is 1/ Abbott 2/ Milliband minor 3/ Milliband major 4/ Balls 5/ Burnam [sic]. I’m sure all my Labour readers will do the right thing and do what I tell them right?

Abuse please. Read the comments over there for inspiration if needed ;-)

Brutal - Barbaric - Sickening - Primeval.......

2010-08-22T21:37:00.001+01:00

Islam....."The Religion Of Peace" for the twenty first Century of which we live.

Lynch mob including Pakistani police officers, slay two innocent brothers

From the daily mail:

Aaaahhh, she moves....

2010-08-21T23:55:00.002+01:00

Go to about 53 seconds in. Regular readers will know why. Those who aren't regulars, see here, and scroll down a bit. Oh, and she talks about prejudice too.

With thanks to Dick Puddlecote:

Margherita Gramegna
Uploaded by Dick_Puddlecote. - News videos hot off the press.

Council permission to sell your car

2010-08-21T13:50:00.002+01:00

Medway again (via Big Brother Watch). And for those who've read this blog over the last two or three days, you'll know exactly what I think of that particular aufority and their shit-for-brains apparatchiks (and no, "Ciggy Busters", I'm not done with you yet).

Trainee plumber Pete Dolling stuck no more than a sheet of paper inside his windscreen advertising his R-reg Ford Escort outside his mum's house in Hempstead.

Soon after, he got a notice slapped on the window from the council's Environment Enforcement Team telling him he had to get their permission to sell his car and then shift it within week four weeks, or risk having it forcibly removed.

The notice said: "The vehicle to which this notice is attached is being offered for sale without consent from Medway Council."

The notice demanded Pete, 32, wrote to the council to prove ownership of the car, that he was not a trader and that it was not causing a nuisance where it was parked, otherwise it would be removed and he would be charged for the cost.

As Dylan Sharpe, the BBW post's author says:

That's right, Pete should have written to the council to ask if he could sell his car. But since when did councils have any sort of jurisdiction over the sale of private property?

If they really wanted to establish he wasn't a trader (although - as a commenter on the Kent website points out - in order to be done as a trader he would have to be advertising in "two or more motor vehicles parked within 500 metres of each other") then they could simply leave a note asking him to call and confirm.

But no, they would rather threaten, demand foreknowledge, and finally give a time limit before they send one of their jobsworths round to tow his car.

The hand-written note in the back window is officially banned.

So, as I was saying, there really is no reason at all to not start divorce proceedings with the lot of 'em.

I sent my first affidavit on the 29th of July. My second goes on the 7th of September. I'VE HAD ENOUGH. And I've never even been to Medway or the People's Republic of Sandwell in all my life.

The obnoxious Rachael Noxon (and co)

2010-08-20T22:30:00.004+01:00

UPDATE: After Noxon removed her name from the Medway Art Directory at some stage in the last 18 hours, a regular commenter has sent me a cached link. Here you go (scroll down a bit, it's highlighted)...

The righteous don't like being played at their own game. Let's keep it going ;-)

r_noxon@btinternet.com

Thanks to some research by the excellent G.O.T I can bring you some further info on one or two of the key advocates of the street theft in Medway.

Starting with Noxon herself:

Medway Breathes (Twitter)
Medway Breathes Blog (all of a sudden, it's hidden. Although Gotty grabbed a screenshot ;-)

And why not have a butchers at page 16 of this document, where she says:

Medway will support the small voluntary organisations interested in applying for funding from the charity fund for a tobacco-related project. The maximum each group can apply for is £5,000 and the Kent Community Foundation, a local charitable foundation, is managing the grant programme and supporting community organisations who are inexperienced when it comes to funding applications.

Noxon the (piss) artist can also be found here. And here also.

Now for Cameraman Goebbels (otherwise known as Ollie Gapper):

Oliie Gapper (Twitter)
Ollie Gapper (Flickr)

And, for some photo based fun, largely involving Margherita Gremagna. The "teacher" in the piece:

"Teacher" Margo posing humbly at an exhibition

Margo behind the camera. Filming shit. Literally.

And, The Youth Themselves. Captured.

"Cuts" for the everyman. Bollocks!

2010-08-20T17:49:00.000+01:00

Next time some sack of sanctimonious shite talks to you about "cuts in public services", really grill them hard on where exactly these cuts in public services are going to occur. They won't fucking know, rest assured. They all still think doctors and nurses provide the bulk of our "services". How little do they know.

More to the point, ask them why they think this is occurring. Could cutting before and after school clubs in the name of tobacco control coordinators have anything to do with it?

You see, it's jobs being cut to fund non-jobs that is the problem. I couldn't give a shit if some piece of Righteous scum, acting (yes, acting) as a Tobacco Control Enforcement Coordinator (whatever one of those is) loses their job. They'd be cheaper on the dole and don't have the legal power to stop us smoking anyway. Not to mention, they're otherwise unemployable.

So, lefty twats, think before you speak. You're pro big government, now you can fucking have it in the way it's dished out to you. You don't get to choose. Just like us.

Don't expect it to be as you wanted. After all, you lobbied for bigger government. Now government is bigger than you.

Tossers.

Righteous Busters...

2010-08-20T15:05:00.000+01:00

UPDATE: Oh look at that, it's back up again:

Thanks to a commenter on the previous thread, who dropped a link to the "Ciggy Busters" Facebook group.

And from communications occuring over at Bucko's place:

"Rachel Noxon, Medway's tobacco control strategic co-ordinator also gave her approval for this stunt. You can contact her as follows:

Rachael Noxon, Tobacco Control Strategic Coordinator
Medway public health directorate
telephone: 01634 331074 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
email: rachael.noxon@medway.gov.uk

It is interesting to note that Medway Council is cutting funding for before and after school clubs for children and for library books whilst retaining the "services" of the Tobacco Control Strategic Coordinator and the spy cars featured on this blog a couple of days ago. Medway Council is a Tory council and it gives an interesting insite into their take on Dave's proclamation about smaller government and getting the state off our backs."

What's that? You want to see what a "Tobacco Control Strategic Coordinator" looks like?

Here you go...

It's been noted by Leg iron that we (i.e. those of a pro property rights, freedom of choice stance) had a little victory yesterday, insofar as cameraman Goebbels — when faced with a little criticism — took the video down within hours of the comments starting to flow.

Leg iron, like many of us, has readily alluded to the fact that smoking is merely where it all starts. And illustrates why.

So now I'd like to suggest that anyone who isn't of the government approved Body Mass Index, anyone who drinks, and anyone who eats salt, fights back at once. Hunt the hunters and turn the tables. Smokers have taken enough. Generally, because despite the propaganda and incitement of violence towards us, we've done what most Brits do, and tried to be reasonable. Doesn't work.

As many of us have said, it'll be your turn next, if you allow it to be. Don't allow it to be. Fight back now, quicker than us smokers did.

As always, I'll happily publish details of those who wish (and attempt) to rule us with a rod of iron.

++ UPDATE 2 ++

How Cameraman Goebbels' interests have changed within 14 hours.

Big Pharma youth

2010-08-19T16:01:00.008+01:00

Now removed...

But...

I'm not going to do the angry thing today. I've done it often enough. Instead, I'm going to attempt to incite out and out abuse and possibly violence. On some fresh faced kids. Really.

But most of all, on their horrendous Nazi-sympathising teacher *, who probably should've been shot at birth (well, if they like totalitarianism so much, I say we give it to 'em).

Leg iron has spoken. Big Brother Watch has spoken. Regardless of what anyone thinks of smoking, you know full well it'll be something you enjoy doing that gets you assaulted in the street next. Anti-smokers, get over your fucking narrow minded, gap-toothed, thick-as-shit, simpleton mentality before the rest of Britain simply abandons you when it's your turn. I already have. Go and get mugged, you shitheads. Watch me laugh at you.

Just come out of McDonald's with your lunchtime chicken burger after a hard morning of earning money soon to be stolen from you by the government and local auforities? 'Ere, you there! Burger Busters About! We'll take that off you. Even though you've paid for it out of taxable income. Have a leaflet listing lots of helplines and web links to whoever has been lobbying government hardest on "healthy foods" over the last 101 days. Better still, have us film it on taxpayer funded cameras. You old stick in the mud...

Just look at the utter contempt they're showing. You buy a packet of cigarettes, pay a truly extortionate amount of duty (four times what the NHS' figures show is spent on treating smoking related illnesses), and if that isn't submission enough to the State, you get mugged in the street for that very same legal product. It's North Korea.

I urge anyone reading this to post on the matter. Even if it's not "your turn" for the State sanctioned violence yet. The Youth will be out to mug you in the street soon enough.

So, any links to Facebook profiles or social networking sites of those involved in this mass mugging will be greatly appreciated and will get a separate post of their own. If they can physically bully us, a bit of counter cyber bullying is good for them. Anyone who disagrees is welcome to defend that stance in the comments. Rest assured, you're not paying my salary.

* No Godwin's Law to be invoked here. Unless you're a poorly-read peasant, of course.

UPDATE: Bucko, of Fuel Injected Moose has posted on the matter also. And has a new post on the emails people are sending into this hideous harridan. I'll post mine shortly.

++ UPDATE 2 ++: Also via Bucko, is the email address of the "teacher" responsible:
margheritagramegna@yahoo.co.uk
Click through the immediately above link to get emails addresses for the school and Medway police.

+++ UPDATE 3 +++ Here's the "it wasn't me, guv, honest" cameraman, Ollie Gapper, calling smokers idiots. And his Facebook profile, in case anyone wants to "befriend" him.

+++ UPDATE 4 ++++ Video removed. I did, however, get the following response to a mild mannered comment of mine (yes Ollie, if you'd left the video up, this blog's readers would've seen just how mild mannered my comment was):

@cuntishsoundbite Oh, well, heres me thinking i could have only insightful comments posted, apparently not. I have not and will not ever smoke, but i hold nothing against those who do. The idea here is awful yes but I have no idea what you want me to 'bring on'.

Cliche youtube cock.

A little prayer?

2010-08-18T15:11:00.004+01:00

Out of twenty first Century Britain...

A stark reminder of what the future holds for us all....

If Carlsberg did arrogant "social commentary"...

2010-08-17T20:12:00.002+01:00

Seriously, read this narcissistic fucking shit on a rainy Tuesday evening. What better incentive to brew your own:

But Shenker said this would have no effect. "Duty rates are so low that to introduce a ban on selling alcohol below the cost of duty and VAT would still allow retailers to sell at dirt-cheap prices. A two-litre bottle of Frosty Jack could still be sold legally for just 78p."

Just listen to that baby kissing, puritan, control freak of a cunt.

All you Hampstead Gruaniad luvvy students deserve everything you get (Fear the witch. No really). I understand your beloved educayshun sector doesn't yet provide courses in home brew. And Daddy's too busy sat on his fat arse in an ill-fitting suit, creaming off money that doesn't actually exist.

Fuck off, Donald. *I* get to decide what I'm allowed to drink whilst I'm causing no harm or loss to anyone else (Ha!). You shut down convenient avenues for me to purchase, I'll create cheap avenues to drink (and heaven forfend, may even invite friends). After earning my money. Competitively. And seeing to it your idols in government don't get any of it.

You self defeating, stupid, fucking mongoloid.

Don't you just love a level playing field?

2010-08-16T03:38:00.001+01:00

I noticed that Yesterday, G.O.T. has a video banned for a little harmless mockery.....

I mean....How dare he?

Mocking Islam and Blue Labour Dhimmi's like that?

Yet as with the video above, Calling for the Caliphate within the U.K. is now deemed fully acceptable?....

Confused?......

Allah Akbar I'm fucking not!!!!

Prudent bookworms tell "Prudence" Brown to fuck off

2010-08-12T12:48:00.001+01:00

Gordon is said to be stable. No female staff members sporting black eyes as yet.

At the time of writing this post, the Fat "Featherlight" Fucker's book — Change We Choose — is sitting pretty as the 315,209th most "popular" ~~book~~ arsewipe on Amazon UK, having been available for more than four months after its release on April Fools Day, and reportedly selling just 32 copies.

Both the Reviews and the Tags pages make comical reading. especially Gordon's very own review of his masterpiece.

Also reported, is that ex-Chairman Brown is to pen yet another book; this time discussing the financial crisis.

I haven't laughed this much in ages. No, really.

H/T Paul Goddard.

Don't Go Away....Time For The Ads.....

2010-08-11T00:33:00.001+01:00

David Loves Julia.....But Why?

2010-08-10T15:49:00.003+01:00

She's Utterly Barking.

Created a "Charity" at the heart of a serving New Labour Regime.

So what the hell is this all about then?

No mind bleach needed...

2010-08-08T14:18:00.003+01:00

...Not after this anyway.

The latest offering from Max Farquar, which suffice to say, I'll be keeping my good eye on:

If you're a feminist, an overtly righteous poof, religious, or don't have sufficient need for alternative mind bleach, you can watch a Bilderberg video instead.

Never say I don't mix it up a bit ;-)

What is the point of the BBC?

2010-08-06T01:01:00.003+01:00

That twat Banana Miliband and his Socialist cronies have just used both "Newsnight", and far left wing think tank "Progress", to announce their plans for the BBC as a "Collective", essentially, because they've lost contact with reality, and see the BBC as a mere tool of New Labour regeneration, and a swift return to power, sometime anon.

Is everything funded by the tax payer now Socialist fucking property then?

What about the licence payers who disagree with the last thirteen Years of Fabian manipulation into the running of the official State broadcaster?

The truth will out.......Perhaps it just has....Fucking hope so!!

From the laughably named "Progress"...

CS left the back door key under the flowerpot

2010-08-05T19:15:00.000+01:00

So I have snuck in for a little posting practice in someone elses style!, Now lets see...

What is CS interested in that I am as well?

Oooo yes, Cross bows! a few weeks ago CS was exhorting us all to go and purchase a X bow for fun and possible self defence if the Zombies ever attack when society breaks down...Well CS I took that advice you gave seriously and sent off for a bow

Curious to see what sort of power it possesed, I fired it at short range at some sacks of earth I had stacked up beside my garden shed, They will stop them thought I...but I hadn't banked on actually missing them at a range of roughly 12ft...No, no, no, no, no sireebob but miss them I did.

Now to show you just how powerful these bows are have a gander at the pics

This is the bow I bought...

The side of my shed with bolt buried through it, this corrugated ~~sound~~ iron is a year old and the heavy guage stuff!

...and thats how far it went through, iron sheet 3in fibreglass insulation and a layer of 1/4 in ply lining....

BRING ON THE ZOMBIES IS WHAT I SAY!!!!

See CS some people do listen to you!

Struggling, big time

2010-08-03T21:00:00.002+01:00

No, really; there's very little for me to say that hasn't been said before. Even without my cuntish narrative.

It largely boils down to the fact that the Cleggeron (as predicted) are exactly the same as the one-eyed mongoloid: patronising, dictatorial, shitstirring name-callers. Especially iDave. There's little left to rail against that hasn't been railed against by others during the identical previous administration.

Railing against stuff doesn't work unless you have a growing audience to make aware of the problem and provide a plan of action to. The MSM-reading loyalists remain true to their cause (which is to ignore everything and hope it goes away, despite providing our politicos with absolutely no incentive to make it so, because they obey and want an easy life).

So I may take a back seat for a short while. Expect the odd opinion piece for now, as I'm usually full of *ahem*, opinion. I will continue to do my little bit to re-open free speech.

But besides that, unless anyone fancies sending me anything interesting to publish (ignored by the MSM), I'll be putting out a little less this month. I've really had enough, and need to focus my energies on getting myself into a proper position whereby I can tell the entire State to fuck themselves off with a rusty cheesegrater. Until the State changes, shrinks, and becomes more or less invisible, I shall hold this position.

Thanks to everyone who has read this rubbish, commented on this rubbish and linked to this rubbish. I'm not done yet (unfortunately). Just recuperating.

Take care, and see you shortly.

Newt Gingrich on Sharia

2010-07-31T08:30:00.003+01:00

Food for thought for the Left:

And more (It's loosely connected. A simple explanation of what Cultural Marxism is all about, and how to implement it by disjointing society through four phases):

H/T Revolution Harry

And here in Britain, a former Muslim talks further on the future implications of actively seeking out Islam for special appeasement.

Two officers cleared of soldier attack

2010-07-31T02:20:00.008+01:00

Two police officers have been cleared of assaulting a former soldier outside a bar in Wigan.

Sgt Stephen Russell and Pc Richard Kelsall, of Greater Manchester Police, were accused of attacking L/Cpl Mark Aspinall in July 2008.

A jury at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court is still considering its verdict on a third man, special constable Peter Lightfoot.

Lightfoot has been found guilty of one count of perjury.

Members of the jury were sent home for the weekend and on Monday will resume deliberations on the charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.

All three officers, who are employed by Greater Manchester Police (GMP), had denied the charge.

The men were charged with the attack in July 2009 following an investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

It followed the emergence of CCTV footage of the arrest of the soldier, who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, in Wigan town centre on 27 July 2008.

We'll find out what becomes of the third (the fat fucker on the left, who visibly scrapes the man's face on the road, before punching him repeatedly, about 30 seconds in) next week.

UPDATE: A regular commenter (and with my thanks), has located a shot of the third defendant — Special Constable Peter Lightfoot:

UPDATE 2: Fat bastard now convicted of assault.

Medieval fucknuts: just what the doctor ordered

2010-07-29T19:15:00.003+01:00

The most intriguing biological discovery since the giant coelacanth.

Tyranny of those oh-so "rad" bushy beards is still rife I see. Looks like we’ve all been paying for lots of women to be sewn back up again to avoid being starved for a fortnight in the attic by Daddy and then beaten to death in Upton Park with baseball bats by Hubby.

But it’s alright, because some bint or other from the government said:

“'The NHS does not fund hymen repair operations for cultural reasons. All operations on the NHS are on the basis of clinical need.

'Operations to repair the hymen are only carried out exceptionally to secure physical or psychological health.'

Psychological health? I shouldn’t wonder. I suspect most people would (just about) prefer having Dr Patel fiddle with their bits for a few minutes, as opposed to having them hacked clean off and thrown into a pond before having acid thrown in their faces. Ye GODS.

But others say:

'It is more cultural rather religious. If the bride is not a virgin and does not bleed on the wedding night, it is a big shame on the family.

'The woman fears that the husband will walk out, divorce or humiliate her all her life [ed: What the fuck? If he was the mong that punctured her in the first place, what's he ranting on about her not being a virgin for?]. There have been honour killings in extreme cases.

Oh, and Catholics, don't think I've forgotten about YOU. Pay for your own damned child molestation appreciation society.

A randy old ponzi scam artist clocks a pert young bottom. Yesterday.

All of you; just keep your sky pixie worship, associated genital fixes and choirboy felching OUT of my wallet (and serve your prison sentences) and then we'll get along just fine.

As things stand, you all disgust me.

Right. I've got a letter to write

2010-07-28T18:30:00.006+01:00

It's a clue

Now it's been proved by this fucking tool (as I predicted back in mid-January, I might add, *cough*) that they really are all the same, I cannot find a single reason not to start taking action to rid myself of the treasonous, treacherous beast that shits in our faces daily (for overseas readers, that means the British government AND the Monarchy).

I am going to write a letter. That's all you have to do to get the ball rolling and get the fragrant smell of establishment blood inside your nostrils for further fun later on.

The treasonous establishment. The establishment that HATES you and me. The establishment that wants total control over you and me — and by implication, total control over your hard earned wealth and mine — has, this very week, prompted me to start initiating divorce proceedings.

In fact, we don't even need to write the letter. The letter has already been written for anyone who wants to post it.

Collect yours via the Ranty One. Get that fragrant smell in your nostrils. You've been shat on for long enough.

Post it to:

Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London
SW1A 1AA

UPDATE: Perhaps the writing was already on the wall back in January last year, with Cameroid giving a "progressive conservatism" speech for DEMOS (Osbourne too, getting favourable coverage), a Lefty, Fabian think tank created by Julia Middleton.

"She helped in the founding of DEMOS, an independent think tank, and Impetus Trust, developing venture philanthropy in the UK".^[12]

Some posts worth reading...

2010-07-26T23:15:00.001+01:00

Nicked from here. No subliminal message about tramps in Charing Cross or anything...

I'm knackered. I can't be arsed to spout my usual incoherent bile. So I'll hand over to some proper writers who write actual articles. Try these:

In Europe and ruled by Europe

There Should Be a Minimum Age for Elected Politicians

Peels Policing Principles-Revised

Partying on down with Allah (Early, I know. Save it for next Friday, ya drunken reprobates)

Real answers to GSCE exam questions (No, really)

A little knowledge

The next generation of pub

News of Non-Muslim getting "offended" on behalf on Muslims (keeping pets being good for your future career prospects, and all that)

Removal of speed cameras no bad thing.

Chicago going downhill fast.

Affidavit sent to David Cameron (Read this and think. I did)

Likewise, if you've spouted some coherent bile, incoherent bile or an article yourself, and would like a backlink from my humble abode, by all means, leave a link to it in the comments and I'll add your bile/article to this very list.

I thank you ;-)

Labour shitting in each other's faces for a nice change

2010-07-25T10:44:00.000+01:00

It's all gonna kick off. Expect broken champagne bottles and lots of "offence".

Here's Mogadishu East MP, veritably overweight vegan and censorship-prone blogger Kerry McCarthy, singing the praises of Blinky Bollocks for the Labour leadership in The New Statesman (published 9th June).

We need a robust leader who can defend Labour’s legacy, and I think Ed is that leader.

[Say what?]

And here she is at the leadership hustings rally for Diane Abbott, a mere 11 days later. She looks shifty, mind. Surely, even she can tell the difference between the two Comrades?

And what the fuck is Bananaboy — standing for the leadership himself — doing nominating Abbott?

Yet another opportunity to call Gordon Brown a cunt

2010-07-25T00:10:00.003+01:00

It's the gift that keeps on giving. Go on, give it back to the one-eyed mongoloid.

When he returns from the Bongo-Bongo land of inter-sibling love and a trillion spam emails, he can throw another one of his female staff members out of her chair as she tries to mask the truth within the fat cunt's mailbox.

Update: From the comments (Thanks to Billy). For additional fun, get the Fat Man-muncher to deny the below:

STRANGELY BROWN

(Posted 21/2/04). NPDE is indebted to Private Eye's, 20th of February, 2004, edition, (No. 1100).

Page 5, has a fascinating piece concerning private documents belonging to the Daily Mail. Some of these documents deal with the year 1997 - a year that saw the death of Gordon McMaster M.P. for Paisley South, in what now appears, increasingly suspicious and sinister circumstances.

In a reply from the editor to the proprietor concerning Mail pundit, Andrew Alexander, Dacre makes a cryptic reference to Gordon Browns homosexuality. Written on October the 9th, 1997.

The Mail On Sunday, published, Brian Deers’ comprehensive insight into the affairs and relationships surrounding McMasters "suicide" in full, also that month. Mr. Deer uncovered that Gordon had taken a sixteen year old Stuart Clark (who he? Ed), to the previous years’ Labour Party Blackpool Conference.

The next time the young Stuart is seen in public, is in the arms of Gordon Brown at the memorial service for the late and lamented Johnstone born, M.P.

Let sleeping dogs lie (no pun intended) I hear you say. But hold on. Is this the same Stuart Clark who at the age of seventeen is gifted a plush two bedroom high amenity flat by Labour controlled, Renfrewshire Council? Who then amasses over £2000s in rent arrears and then has the Chancellor of the Exchequer's "researcher" arrive at the council buildings after closure, in a taxi at the 25th hour, and pay the amount in full, in cash.

(The NPDE is also indebted to the distinguished journalist, Dean Nelson. Without his assistance the penultimate paragraph of this article would have been impossible to write. Cont. p.94)

You know me. On the fence (proverbially speaking), as always ;-)

Jihad Me @ Hello

2010-07-24T22:40:00.000+01:00

With inspirational thanks to Gotty ;-)

If neither is to your taste, I suggest you try here.

Or...

H/T Barking Spider.

A case against Cultural Marxism

2010-07-24T16:52:00.013+01:00

(From the USA)

Watch this welfare supported, crackhead fucknut (sent in by a friend):

Coming to a city near you. Yesterday.

Then watch Thomas Sowell (particularly his comments on welfare, which would appear to be backed up by the above):

Then make a case for "progressive", racially stimulated policies. Now THAT's what I call homework.

No wonder Sowell is lesser known than Bollock Maobama was even 5 years ago, and seemingly limited to writing in niche publications. The "liberal" elite would rather he didn't infect the effnik populations of America with anything like enterprise or self reliance. They're pets, after all.

Listen up "Minorities", you are largely owned by the State for political/power purposes. It's obvious. Not just in America, but HERE and NOW. Get your thumbs out of your arseholes and take control of your own lives. Today.

Terry Kelly sussed - shock horror!

2010-07-24T03:15:00.001+01:00

"I froze your tears and made a dagger

And stabbed it in my cock, forever
It stays there like Excalibur
Are you my Arthur?
Say you are"

Pure genius. And I don't just mean the post. Or indeed, the fact the Good Councillor — hater of all things capitalist — bought his council house under Thatcher's right-to-buy scheme and now has a tidy stash pugged away. Hypocrisy is NOT what socialists do, you hear?

I welcome "Arthur" aboard the goodship TerryScepticism. Have fun, me old chum ;-)

New improved liberal Halal search engine

2010-07-23T01:30:00.003+01:00

Booooo...! It doesn't call you names anymore ;-(

Just make sure you're not a poof, eh? ;-) Although all is not lost....

(By the way, if you're a female or a bit gay, and browsing this, and clicking the above links, you may leave here thinking I'm a bit of a pig [ha!]. That's totally intended).

More useful idiocy from the Daily Wail

2010-07-22T10:42:00.002+01:00

I may be paranoid (in fact, I know I am), but if there was ever proof of just how fucked our ~~nation~~ EU Airstrip is, read the following. Be sure to check the comments:

At last! An end to 24-hour drinking: Victory for the Mail as ministers pledge to scrap Labour's failed licensing laws

A war on Booze Britain will dismantle Labour's failed 24-hour drinking laws and ban the sale of dirt-cheap alcohol.

At the time of putting this little post together, the below comment had been "red arrowed" 111 times:

Why should those who know haw [sic] to drink and behave properly be penalised because stupid idiots cannot. This smacks of liebour nanny state.
- realist, newport gwent, 22/7/2010 07:00

The Mail and a fair-sized swathe of their fascist (I don't use that word lightly), mong readership obviously disagree with that statement — or rather — the obvious comparison of their beloved Coalition to Communitarian New Labour. One suspects the goodship Great Repeal Bill has hit upon stony ground. As intended, of course.

But really, when so many of our own over-aspirational, keeping-up-with-the-fucking-Joneses populace actively support a newspaper that campaigns to drain ordinary, sensible, law abiding people of even more, you reach levels of despair and anger towards your fellow man that even the Frankfurt School would struggle to inflict.

And for further righteous, leftist guff (and lies), see the headline here, then look at the article's main picture.

Update: Dick Puddlecote is on the case.

New addition to the family

2010-07-21T14:46:00.000+01:00

The three of you who regularly tune in here will know I have a soft spot (that occasionally gets harder) for all things archery or archery related. Not least; crossbows.

Recently I ordered the below amiable looking chap:

As it transpires, it's a bloody good bit of kit. Great fun for the garden, and will do serious damage to a Yellow Pages if used as an indoor target from 8 or 9 yards off. Good fun for the living room too. If the wife's out. And you're sober. And the wife's out.

What struck me most of all — apart from the typically difficult-to-string recurve prod — was the price of it. Not to mention how quickly you can cock and fire the thing.

A bare minimum order (that's no targets, wax, scope/sights or spare string) comes in at just under £45 with a pack of 10 bolts included. Bearing in mind also, that this thing on top form can fire at speeds close to 200 feet-per-second (the manufacturer says 200 fps, so we'll round that down to 180-185 fps).

It's clouty (more so than the average cheap rifle crossbow), and as well as being handy for defence (I imagine), it doubles as great fun hobbywise.

By the way, contrary to my previous post on this subject, Amazon UK's supply of crossbows seems to have dried up. Only toy versions and accessories available now (righteous bastards).

However, a commenter on the previous crossbow-related post named richard pointed me to this site instead.

It's fair to say I'm well fucking chuffed ;-)

I can't be arsed!

2010-07-20T21:09:00.005+01:00

Some Labour voters in Tower Hamlets, this evening. I'm writing to you from my local masjid (living room full of cider)

I'm knackered, so rather than attempt to put something together on any subject matter whatsoever, I'd like to point you to YABA (yet another burkha article) put forth from a wholly different angle to what we've seen throughout most of the libertarian blogosphere so far.

But - before you click through - see if you can hazard a guess as to who the following quote is from.

See what you think:

These British apologists for the burka make me see red, whatever side of the political spectrum they come from.

They can be Left-wingers who'll countenance no criticism, however valid, of hardline Muslims. They can be Right-wing libertarians who insist any woman has the right to wear whatever she chooses.

And, as we discovered this week, they can be members of the British Cabinet who ludicrously claim the burka actually empowers women.

Well, yer can't do right for doing wrong ;-)

What a knob (when I say knob, I mean the "quotee", not the aforelinked blogger, who can be rather good).

UPDATE: The Boiling Frog puts forth a very readable, hard-to-disagree-with counter argument.

Slap a twat

2010-07-16T22:35:00.006+01:00

What fun!

Whilst Fat Poof Dale gears up for his latest annual publicity grab, and some Marxist chump or other attempts to take it all very seriously indeed, over at GOT's place you'll find an uncensored, unmoderated platform in order to list your top 10 (or even 2 or 3, if you like) blogging twats from anywhere across the political spectrum.

Basically, all you need to do is list your blogging twats from 1 to [whatever] in order of total twattishness, either in the comments section at Gotty's, or by sending an email to the following address:

blogtwatspoll@gmail.com

Told you it'd be fun ;-)

Guess who

2010-07-15T23:36:00.004+01:00

Can you guess who penned the below? (Clue: he is an avid reader of this blog. Daily, in fact. Sometimes three times daily)

"What if the prisoner decided that stoning would give him/her another couple of hours to live despite the suffering and, maybe just maybe something might just turn up during that time to save them: let me ask you these 2 questions 1/ just how daft does my suggestion sound? plenty daft I hear you murmur. And 2/ how many times have you been condemned to death? My hypothesis is that arguing for stoning to death is entirely understandable but: it puts some people in the position of supporting capital punishment as long as it’s not by stoning or maybe some other means and; there are many."

No, fuck off ;-) That's all you're getting.

Comments please (shouldn't take long, eh, regulars? ;-)).

Dog burned alive by all of society

2010-07-14T09:55:00.014+01:00

It's only a matter of time before some Righteous Cultural Marxist type turns up to blame the socio economic conditions and social exclusion for this one.

A horrified community is demanding justice after two yobs locked a dog inside a cage, doused it in petrol and let it burn to death.

The sickening act of cruelty was carried out in a bin shelter at the bottom of Shalden House, in Tunworth Crescent, Roehampton, last Friday night.

We have decided to print this shocking image in the hope it will prompt whoever knows who committed this grotesque crime to come forward.

A victim of right wing, bigotted, small government
thinking, yesterday. If only little Jayden could have had those
£95 Nike's...

Furious residents on the estate immediately set up a group on social networking site Facebook called “name and shame the sick ******** that burnt that poor dog alive!!”.

The dog, a rottweiler believed to be called Kairn, was heard yelping and barking between 10.30pm and 11pm. A Metropolitan Police spokeswoman said two boys aged between 14 and 15 “were seen to throw petrol over the dog and run away”.

Neighbours tried in vain to help it by throwing buckets of water over
the subsequent blaze. It was eventually extinguished by five firefighters from Wandsworth Fire Brigade, who were called shortly before 11pm.

Bernie Bright, a 42-year-old mum who lives in the block, said just thinking about the heartless attack made her cry.

She said: “We, as a community, are so angry, shocked and saddened that someone has done this to a poor dog and would like it known so hopefully witnesses come forward.”

Posting on the Facebook group, which already has close to 1,000 members, Michelle Louise Casteel said: “As a dog owner and lover words actually fail me. What possesses someone to get up one day and decide to do that – it’s vile, disgusting and horrendous.”

Josie Williams-Eustace wrote: “If they can do such a thing to a poor dog locked in a cage then what next?”

Ms Bright said her shock was made worse because its body was not removed until Sunday. She claimed a dog control officer arrived on Saturday, discovered it had been microchipped and traced him to an owner in Essex.

An RSPCA spokesman said: “The dog was collected by the RSPCA officer who covers the Roehampton patch at the first available opportunity. The dog was part of a crime scene and if they deemed it necessary, as the dog had died, the police could have removed the body themselves at an earlier stage.”

A spokesman for Wandsworth Council said officers were aware of the incident and ready to assist Wandsworth CID.

The Metropolitan Police spokeswoman said both yobs were wearing woolly hats but no more information was known.

Anyone with information should call Wandsworth police on 0300 123 1212.

You MISSED it

2010-07-13T22:04:00.005+01:00

I did try to tell you ;-)

Anyway, without further ado, watch some fit posh tart called Sarah Young tell us all about "the struggle" plus assorted ugly blokes. What the fuck Sarah would know about it, I don't know. But take note, paupers:

Just get yer tits out and shut up, Sarah...

Oh, and watch for that weird little man with glasses at the end. Don't mock...

Arrogant bastard. But did anyone expect any different?

2010-07-13T08:19:00.003+01:00

"Yes, people do want to get stuck in"

"Yes, people do want to make their voices heard"

"Of course, there are suggestions which aren't going to be taken up by this government [ed:like anything remotely unprofitable to the State and Big Pharma], whether it's I dunno, changing the smoking ban"

Sleepless in Shitistoke

2010-07-12T19:44:00.008+01:00

The BBC (a well known Muslim organisation) are very very keen to tell us all about what's happening in Stoke-on-Trent's "education" system, presumably to cause religious tensions so that in a year or so, they can shriek "Noooooo! The rise of the BNP (that hasn't actually happened)" and shit.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council has issued an 11-page Ramadan guide for schools to help pupils who may be fasting when the school year starts in September.

It said swimming was acceptable to Muslims but posed a high risk of swallowing water that may break a fast.

Swimming is very very acceptable to people of any religion if someone throws you in the fucking river. Anyway, enough of that business of being prepared. If you're a Muslim, you miss swimming, yes?

Noooo. That'll be everyone, according to this bollocks:

The council guide states: "Schools with a significant number of Muslim pupils should try to avoid scheduling swimming lessons during Ramadan to remove unnecessary barriers to full participation."

Nope, sorry, that's all of you. One size fits none. Let's breed that resentment. There evidently aren't enough BNP-ers on the council yet. Let's fix that and then scream about it in the Grauniad afterwards:

It also suggests re-scheduling sex education classes during the holy lunar month, as Muslim followers who have reached puberty are required to avoid sexual thoughts during this period.

I can help with that. Look at this, boys (and veil-clad girls) and see if you think sexual thoughts after that. There. No need for further authoritative action. Problem fucking solved. For good, probably:

The council said the document, produced by its Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education, was based on information from the Muslim Council of Great Britain, an ~~terror supporting~~ umbrella organisation that claims to represent up to 500 Muslim groups in the UK.

Right, listen Righteous. If Muslims don't want to swim, then don't make them fucking swim. If non-Muslims DO want to swim, then don't stop them from fucking swimming. DO NOT think I don't see through this divide and conquer bullshit.

It's a choice. A religious choice. And frankly, I'm sick of hearing about people who choose to worship by Medieval standards being "stood up for" by gated community posh bastards trying to score a quick political point and a secured six figure salary for years to come.

Righteous: shut the fuck up. You speak for nobody. Just your own coffers.
Muslim Council of Great Britain: shut the fuck up. You speak for nobody. Just your own coffers (and the occasional terrorist)
Stoke City Council: shut the fuck up. You speak for nobody. Just your own coffers.

All of you; just do as you're fucking well told.

Bastards.

Updated: Councillor Terry Kelly: in pictures. Sunday FUN!

2010-07-11T22:22:00.000+01:00

UPDATE: The big anti-racist says in his comments: "I watch Fox News a lot and can only conclude that Americans are the stupidest people on the planet."

Cunt. You lot taught us all to be "offended", so reap the whirlwind, you fat bastard.

Wow. That was quite a response. Especially for a smalltime backwater blog like this.

You didn't seriously think that was the end of it, did you? There's fucking bagloads of comedy to be had here, "Comrades" ;-)

For with the artistic abilities of the insurmountable Gotty and the hilarious Houdini (I thank you both most sincerely) we now have a visual feast of provocative cuntishness that will probably see the Good Councillor either rush to the press "offended", or go into an apoplectic fit that will probably kill him. Get used to it. This blog is MEANT to offend people, upend people, and generally shit on the carpets of those who purport to "rule" by iron fist, in any capacity. Just like they shit on yours and mine.

Pour yourself a glass of red and laugh your bollocks off. I did:

It's coming. Watch this space. Just like Terry does.

A Terry Kelly "wordle". Inspired by his own postings. Read and discuss below.

Ah, bliss...

Did I say "bliss"? Fucking scrub that, you landwhales.

What cracking good Sunday fun!

Oh, and I DEMAND this post gets a mention in the Herald. Although when it comes to the meeja, Terry isn't unfamiliar himself.

P.S: I've got fans.

I'll be supporting the Dutch...

2010-07-11T12:03:00.007+01:00

Here's why.

Somebody pass Iain Dale the mindbleach.

UPDATE: No fucking blowjob for me then. I'll just have to drink shitloads of whisky and personify total zombification at work tomorrow.

+++ UPDATED +++ Councillor Terry Kelly: thuggish brute and scourge of the Scottish political blogosphere

2010-07-09T14:40:00.001+01:00

UPDATE: The Councillor can be appeased here. He's really not pleased with me ;-)

And for my Scottish readers (or rather, reader)...

Those of you who regularly read this blog (there's about 4 of you) will know I conduct the occasional "review", with the extensible help of those in the know, to bring you a socialist scalp every so often. For my own entertainment mainly. I just can't stand the cunts.

A bit like Neil Lees-gate. Who's a pillock, but decides not to let that minor hindrance in physical strength, brains or talent bother him.

And today, Councillor Terry Kelly, it's your turn. You deep-fried Mars bar scoffing, bullying bastard.

Councillor Terry Kelly with his sons. In the 80s. They've eaten more since.

Here we have a socialist blogger with an entire archive dedicated to him. A socialist blogger with friends in the Scottish Communist Party who he's not too fat to utilise, and a socialist blogger who - rumours abound - doesn't actually run his own blog. His "beautiful" daughter does. The clue is in the URLs to his uploaded photos:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PnvkZzy66XQ/TA0durFFTWI/AAAAAAAAAGA/
6lJY8HtOdj0/s1600/dad%2520%26%2520corinder%2520man.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PnvkZzy66XQ/TA0fIR9Tf2I/AAAAAAAAAGQ/
6MbaZyO8saU/s1600/dad%2520rally%25206.jpg

Rayleen Kelly is probably the one on the right. And lads, she's single.

(Photos from fatso's offerings here. Click the pics to view the links).

One or two of us re-educated the good councillor in the comments thread here. He didn't stand a hope in hell against our collective superior intellects and provocative cuntishness, but I consider myself a chap with knowledge to pass on, and if that ungrateful pig doesn't want it, that's his loss.

But whatever you do, don't post as an anonymous (actually, fuck that. Do it and watch the predictable old bozo try to call you a "fascist". Just for laughs). One of his favourite authoritarian tactics is to demand to know who you are. He attempts to hide it with principle, but we all know that's bollocks.

Cllr Terry Kelly said...
(Corrugated Soundbite) 08/06/10

My superior knowledge does indeed shine through that’s why I get elected [ed: well it ain't for your fucking grammar, is it councillor].

I think that when someone sends me an insulting comment or expresses a very strong contrary opinion to mine they should let people know who they are, I am suspicious of people who do not name themselves. [ed: on the fucking internet??]

How can you rant and rave at me and call me all sorts and then not name yourself; maybe it’s because I am from a slightly earlier generation but to me it is one thing only, cowardice!

A couple of years back, a few right wing and libertarian Scottish bloggers got right under the skin of our Terry, questioning his Communist principles and what that meant for them. Which is understandable, seeing as he's somehow - by hook or most probably by crook - made it to the lofty heights of elected councillor.

Suffice to say, they were investigated in full by the Scottish Communist Party (having fallen for his "name yourself, you dishonourable scoundrel!" line) and it even went as far as the uber-left Scottish Herald. Several Scottish bloggers had their details posted online, along with the receipt of threats. Front windows were put in, that sort of thing. The result being this; the blog they used in order to document his online, publicly visible attacks has disappeared. As luck would have it, I'm not in Scotland so here we pretty much have free reign to do as we fucking well please.

For further insight into the mindset of this bloody-minded Communist, here he is again, accusing the centre left SNP of being far right racists:

The truth is that the nationalists have no more sympathy for the Asian community than they do for the English whom they hate [ed:tired old argument mate, I don't hate Europe but I want out of the EU]. They have callously used and manipulated the Asian vote for their own political ends: perhaps more of the Asian community will begin to look more closely at them now after this calculated decision by the SNP to exclude them.

So, if anyone has anything to add about this odious, full-blown Communist fucker (providing Blogger's comment system isn't playing up), feel free to do so in the comments below and have those points added into the article.

Kelly's a thug. And there's only one way to deal with them.