The emperor's used clothes

I don’t normally bother much with the party political blogs (with the exceptions of some UKIP and LPUK ones) instead favouring the unaligned blogs written by individuals with their own sets of concerns.

Recently I’ve been looking around the Tory blogs and I’m mildly stunned (dunno why though) at the MSM-style dodging of the issues that they seemed to collectively lambaste when the One-Eyed Calamitous Car Crash and Comrades were at the helm.

I’ve compiled a little list of issues and problems the Tory Claque (as dubbed by Richard of EU Referendum) have seemingly consciously or silently agreed not to mention very often:

• The EU

• The continuation of engineered mass immigration into an already overcrowded UK

• The many flaws in IDS’ proposed schemes for the unemployed because of negligence of the above points. How do you fit five million+ into half a million jobs? Many of which are temporary

• The Afghan war

• The bansturbation

• The lack of, well—anything whatsoever to restore civil liberties

• Enforced globalisation

• More climate change fraud

• More taxes (“fat tax” rearing its ugly head again).

• The debt (never mind the deficit—that’s easily fixed with a few tweaks. Just don’t mention the debt! Stand back, say nothing and watch it grow. Our children's' future servitude depends on it. So does ours).

So in effect, with so many current partisan Tory bloggers (obviously I exclude those who’ve seen right through “Cam" and The Boy and become unaligned right wingers) are telling us is that all the above is now OK because it’s their man organising it. Or rather, he's ignoring it, enjoying the excuse of the Limp Dems' presence and maintaining the status quo with spin and divide and conquer exercises.

Some of them work for the party in some capacity or other, so obviously it’s in their best interests to keep quiet and pump out whatever distraction Cameron and his cronies want them to. Reminds me of essay copying at school, where we’d all copy from the clever kid (he could be bribed without coercion) and then use a thesaurus to alter a few words in the naive hopes that Mr Fatty Brown Trousers wouldn't notice. Same hypothesis and conclusion, of course. Some conclusions were just a little bit more Shakespearian than others.

But then there are others who are simply members. They actually part with membership fees to be a tiny cog in a segment of the British arm of an international machine that stamps in all our faces in the exact same manner as Labour did. And for that, just as I do with the Labour and Lib Dem lot, I thank them most sincerely. They don’t (usually) even have the excuse of the chronic levels of retardation and brain flatulence that reside within the Labour grassroots, and it's too cold for sandals thanks to global climate disruption (climate delayed by fifteen minutes due to a salvo of spunk ejaculated from an 8th floor penthouse onto a pantograph). So it must just be denial. Or worse.

No really. If there's a difference between iDave, The Boy and the grandees, and those who came before them, I'd love you to point it out (apart from lookswise. Nobody can be as physically vomit-inducing as Labour). Truth is, on the big issues, there is none. Hence so many Tory bloggers resort to waffling on about trivialities because some left wing wanker said something "unnice" about Nadine Dorries—a woman who has employed family members on good salaries paid for by us and troughed relentlessly just like a left wing wanker. Not to mention, she's democratic enough to switch off commenting on her blog, for which we pay the hosting fees.

I didn't like Punch and Judy when I was a child and I like it even less now. Less than boiled cabbage and Somalians.

Please just see that the new boss is exactly the same as the old boss in its desire to be the boss at the behest of the real bosses. Political tribalism in this climate is utterly pointless.

Oh, and The Boy has been to Bilderberg a few times.