Doing to the "do-ers" what they do to us

I've been reading and watching a lot about Marxism and Critical Theory. The theory being exactly that—to criticise. No more, no less, and only authoritarian/totalitarian "solutions" available.

Just criticism and antagonism, as long as it's beneficial to those in authority and conducive to restrictions of basic freedoms and to trashing common values within a nation state. Nation states which, as we know, that weasel-faced suited subordinate from the "nation" of paedophiles and half-decent chocolate thinks are bad, bad things.

So I'm gathering a list of unanswered questions, in the hopes that maybe one or two of you might like to add to them in the comments section?

• Why—if nicotine is so bad—are there adverts for patches and gum full of the stuff on the telly?

• Why—if we're supposedly (and no, I don't believe it) fighting expensive wars in the Middle East/Western Asia to spread "Western style democracy", are our overlords doing piss all, and even encouraging by their lack of speaking out, the growth of Sharia Law in Britain?

• Why—if our overlords are so keen to get the British unemployed back into work, do our mongs and faux EU-sceptics insist we're better off within the EU when the EU goes about making deals like this? And why do their useful idiots stay so quiet about it? Brainwashing and tribalism, anyone?

• Why does nobody criticise Kosher ritual sacrifice of livestock (I think I can guess this one)? It's exactly the same as Halal ritual sacrifice. The beard and soppy pyjamas (or lack thereof) of the backyard assassin means very little when having a blunt blade ripped through your throatal tissue.

• Why do the Green Communists never question the obvious inconsistencies of wind power, when the tide never, ever stops moving, thus making wave/tidal power a more viable option than wind?

• Why have the Tory bloggers been so quiet about this? There's more to principle than a rosette. Apart from purposes of identification, it doesn’t really matter if your mugger is sporting a similar shade of stonewash Wranglers to you or not when the mugging takes place. Does it?

• Why does nobody realise the obvious similarities between governments and protection rackets? Both will use violence against you if you don't pay, and both offer to "protect" you when you do (the police, the NHS, street football coordinators, lesbian outreach workers, etc. All just as useless as the "protection" offered by rackets).

• Why—if British culture is so repugnant and something we need to feel so guilty about all the bloody time, do people from all over the Second and Third Worlds flock here to enjoy at least some of its benefits? And why, when our Establishment constantly tell us these people are here to avoid persecution back home in their own cultures, do they constantly decry anyone who shows concern about the growth of those same violent, witch doctor-driven cultures in parts of Britain?

• And why—if all these expensive gadgets and embellishments really did "save time for busy professionals" as marketed, do so few people question why they're still so busy these days (and thousands of pounds later)?

That's just a very, very few. Fancy adding some more?

UPDATE: Harbinger has added some further thinkies into the mix via the comments:

Why when we have 3million unemployed do they continue to import more immigrants, unskilled at that from polar opposite cultures?

Another point:

Why are we continually attacked in society for prejudice and racism were Harriet Harman's positive discrimination laws created?

Another point:

Why are the government complaining of the workshy and hoping to bring in Slave Labour community service for the unemployed, when they already have signed a JSA agreement that allows the government to dock their benefit if they don't adhere to their contract?

Another point:

Why are so many victims of anti white crime, washed under the carpet yet victims of white crime published in every paper up and down the land?

Another point:

Why can criminals take the government to court for losing their right to vote when as everyone should know they lose (or should lose) all civil rights when they commit a crime?